How to Study ArchitectureCaffin, Charles H. (Charles Henry)
History
How to Study Architecture
Caffin, Charles H. (Charles Henry)
Architecture -- History
=Organic Relations.=--The height of the building was thoughtfully
proportioned to the length and width; the height of the shaft of the
column was considered in relation to the diameter. Similar care was
expended on the proportions of the several members of the capitals and
entablature, and the intercolumniation bore relation to the lower
diameter of the shafts. In every particular, great or little, the effort
was to create a unified impression of organic harmony and rhythmical
relations.
Now the term organic is primarily used of the living bodies of animals
and plants, the parts of which are not only connected but perform
certain functions in relation to the well-being of the whole. And it is
an extension of this idea that the Hellenes applied to the geometrical
harmony on which their architecture was based. They considered the
functions of each part--the amount of support it gave or strain it had
to sustain and so forth; and having made provision for this as
constructors, they were consistent to the principle also in their
æsthetic consideration as artists. They modified the sculptural
decoration according to the function of the parts; giving least to those
whose function of support was most important and increasing the quantity
and the boldness of the curving as the structural strain diminished.
Thus the shaft of the column was free of any carving except the fluting,
which, however, served the purpose of channels to carry the rain water
and helped to preserve the mass from decay. The capital in the Doric
style was not enriched with ornament, and similarly plain, with very few
exceptions, was the architrave. Meanwhile, sculptured figures in high
relief were introduced into the metopes which originally had been
openings, while the _tympanum_ or flat surface of the pediment received
groups of figures in the round. This increased boldness of relief,
accompanied by foreshortening of the figures, was adopted to offset the
diminishing effect that their greater distance from the spectator’s eye
would otherwise have suggested. Moreover, in the sculptures, as in the
carving of the mouldings, the varying quantities of light were
considered. The mouldings on the outside of a temple in full sunlight
were differently planned from those in the interior; and the shadow cast
by the cornices was taken into account in graduating the relief of the
sculptures in the metopes and pediments.
Nor was the actual work done by artists, but under their supervision by
pupils and masons. From the records of payments made to the sculptors
who worked on the Erechtheion it appears that they were ordinary masons,
some of them not even citizens, who were paid for each figure the sum of
60 drachms, or 12 dollars!
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account