How to thought-read : $b A manual of instruction in the strange and mystic in daily life, psychic phenomena, including hypnotic, mesmeric, and psychic states, mind and muscle reading, thought transference, psychometry, clairvoyance, and phenomenal spiritualismCoates, James
Religion
How to thought-read : $b A manual of instruction in the strange and mystic in daily life, psychic phenomena, including hypnotic, mesmeric, and psychic states, mind and muscle reading, thought transference, psychometry, clairvoyance, and phenomenal spiritualism
Coates, James
Clairvoyance; Spiritualism; Telepathy
During these experiments the sensitive will say, “I _see_ this,” or
describe that other, as if he actually saw. Hence the infinitely close
relationship of mind-reading to clairvoyance. Thought-reading in
spiritualism will be referred to in the next chapter.
Once possessing a good sensitive, the development of the power, as
a matter of fact, lies particularly in the operator’s ability to
concentrate and focus his thoughts--to think clearly, calmly, vividly,
and distinctly himself--and to deliberately and conscientiously project
the same.
THE NORMAL EXPERIMENTS WITHOUT CONTACT.
A pleasant hour or so can be profitably filled up on a long winter’s
evening with experiments in mind reading, without resorting to
mesmerism. It will be found that there are mind-readers in every
family--some boy, girl, or young woman more sensitive than the rest to
impressions.
Sometimes it has been found, when two or more persons think of the
same object, as in the “willing game,” the impression becomes more
vivid, and the sensitive finds, or describes, the article, or thing,
more easily. It has been left to the versatility of Professor Lodge,
of the University College, Liverpool, to project two distinct images
at the same time to a sensitive. He requested two friends to look at
a paper that he had given to each. On one paper a square was drawn,
and on the other an oblique cross. Neither person knew what the other
was looking at, and after they had looked intently at these diagrams
for a short time, the sensitive, who was in a normal condition, but
blindfold, said:--“I see two figures--first I see one, and then,
below that, another. I do not know which I am to draw. I cannot see
either plainly.” Having been requested to draw what she saw, she drew
a square, with an oblique cross inside of it. On being questioned,
she replied that she did not know why she placed the cross in the
square. The two images projected by distinct minds, intermingled, and
were produced, as narrated by Professor Lodge. We can readily see
that confusion will arise where a number of persons are thinking of
different subjects, or when some positive-minded individual declares
mind-reading to be an impossibility.
Something after the above experiments of Professor Lodge are those
which were conducted by Mr. Guthrie, a London barrister, and reported
by him to the Society of Psychical Research.
A number of diagrams, roughly drawn off-hand at the time, were shown to
the agent or precipitant, Mr. G., the subject, or percipient, a lady,
being blind-fold. During the process of transference, the agent looked
steadily and in silence at the drawing, the subject meanwhile sitting
opposite to him, and behind the stand on which the drawing lay, so
that it was entirely out of her range of vision had her eyes not been
blind-folded.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account