How to Visit the English CathedralsSingleton, Esther
History
How to Visit the English Cathedrals
Singleton, Esther
Cathedrals -- England
“Yes, it is the same nave, only colder and whiter, on which Anselm,
the saintly archbishop, and Rufus gazed; the same avenue of massy
pillars--then scarcely finished--through which Maud the Empress
often went to her prayers with her chivalrous half-brother, Earl
Robert. Beauclerc, her father, too, and some grey-haired survivors
of Hastings must have looked on these huge columns crowned with
their round arches which excite our wonder to-day. They were a
curious fancy of the architect of Serlo; or was it not probably a
design of a yet older artist of Edward the Confessor? These
enormous round shafts, which are the peculiar feature of the nave
of our storied abbey, have only once been repeated, probably by the
same architect, in the neighbouring abbey of Tewkesbury, a few
years later. There is nothing like them on either side of the
silver streak of sea. The Tewkesbury copies are slightly smaller;
otherwise they are exact reproductions of Gloucester.”--(S.)
The Nave differs from other Norman naves like those of Peterborough, Ely
and Norwich.
“The unique features here are the great height of the massive
circular columns, fourteen in number, and the consequently dwarfed
triforium or gallery running over the main arches. There are traces
to be seen of the original Norman clerestory under the
Perpendicular windows, and, judging from this, the height of the
clerestory, as originally constructed, must have been but little
less than that of the piers in the nave.
“This Norman clerestory was altered at the same time that the roof
of the nave was vaulted--viz. in 1242, in the time of Henry Foliot.
This work was done by the monks themselves, who thought, as
Professor Willis suggests, that they could do it better than common
workmen. Their work is made of a light and porous kind of stone,
treated with plaster on the under-side, and it was rendered
necessary by the previous roof, which was of wood, having been
destroyed by fire in 1190. Of this fire the piers certainly show
the traces to this day, all having become reddened and slightly
calcined. To make the new clerestory the whole of the original
Norman work over the arcade of the triforium was removed, with the
exception of the jambs of the side-lights (which extended beyond
the arches of the triforium) and the wall between them.”--(H. J. L.
J. M.)
All the stone-work was originally painted.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account