Hugh Wynne, Free Quaker: Sometime Brevet Lieutenant-Colonel on the Staff of his Excellency General WashingtonMitchell, S. Weir (Silas Weir)
History
Hugh Wynne, Free Quaker: Sometime Brevet Lieutenant-Colonel on the Staff of his Excellency General Washington
Mitchell, S. Weir (Silas Weir)
Quakers -- Fiction; United States -- History -- Revolution, 1775-1783 -- Fiction
“And this deed?” said my aunt; “you were about to speak of it.”
“It is,” he replied, “a simple act of sale for one shilling, a
reconveyance of Wyncote from William to Hugh, the date October 9, 1671.
It is in order, and duly witnessed.”
“Well?”
“As to its present value, Mistress Wynne, there is a consensus of
opinion between the Attorney-General and myself.”
“That is to say, you agree,” said my aunt.
“Precisely, madam. It is our belief that the lapse of time has probably
destroyed the title. There is no annexed trust, on William’s part, to
hold for his brother’s use, and the length of undisputed, or what we
lawyers call adverse, possession--something like an hundred years or
more--_seems_ to make it impossible for my friends to oust the present
holder. Am I clear?”
“Too clear, sir,” said my aunt. “Is that all?”
“No;” I said, “it seems there are other questions, such as the mention
of the matter in letters. If the succeeding brothers in letters or
otherwise from time to time acknowledged the rights of Hugh Wynne, that
might serve to keep alive the claim; if, too, it can be proved that at
any time they paid over to Hugh or his son, your brother, madam, rents
or dues, as belonging to these American claimants, this too would serve
to give some validity to your present claim. It is a question of dates,
letters, and of your possession of evidence in the direction of repeated
admissions on the part of the Welsh holders.”
My Aunt Gainor was at once confident. Search should be made. She had
some remembrance in her childhood of this and that. In fact, my aunt
never admitted the existence of obstacles, and commonly refused to see
them. Mr. Wilson shook his head dubiously. “There seems to have been
negligence or a quite culpable indifference, madam. The time to be
covered by admissions is long, and the statutes of 32 Henry VIII. and
21 James I., 1623, do, I fear, settle the matter. The lapse in the
continuity of evidence will be found after the death of Hugh. Twenty
years will suffice, and I am forced to admit that your claim seems to me
of small value. It was simply an estate given away, owing to want of the
simplest legal advice.”
“Wait until I look through our papers,” said my aunt. “We are not done
with it yet, nor shall be, if I have my way, until the courts have had a
chance to decide.”
“It will be mere waste of money, my dear lady. Now, at least, you can do
nothing. The war is not over, and when it is, none but an English court
can settle the title. I confess it seems to be a case for amicable
compromise.”
“There shall be none--none,” said my aunt.
“And we are just where we began,” said I.
“Not quite,” he returned. “You may have a case, but it seems to me a
weak one, and may lie in chancery a man’s lifetime. I, as a friend as
well as a lawyer, knowing you have no need of the estate, hesitate
to advise you to engage in a suit of ejectment. I should rather
counsel--ah, that may be Mr. Wynne.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account