Human nature and the social orderCooley, Charles Horton
Science
Human nature and the social order
Cooley, Charles Horton
Individualism; Social psychology; Sociology
But the most radical remedy for the mortifications and uncertainties of
the social self is not the negative one of merely secluding or
diminishing the I, but the positive one of transforming it. The two are
not easily distinguishable, and are usually phases of the same process.
The self-instinct, though it cannot be suppressed while mental vigor
remains, can be taught to associate itself more and more with ideas and
aims of general and permanent worth, which can be thought of as higher
than the more sensual, narrow, or temporary interests, and independent
of them. It must always be borne in mind that the self is any idea or
system of ideas with which is associated the peculiar appropriative
attitude we call self-feeling. Anything whose depreciation makes me feel
resentful is myself, whether it is my coat, my face, my brother, the
book I have published, the scientific theory I accept, the philanthropic
work to which I am devoted, my religious creed, or my country. The only
question is, Am I identified with it in my thought, so that to touch it
is to touch me? Thus in “Middlemarch” the true self of Mr. Casaubon, his
most aggressive, persistent, and sensitive part, is his system of ideas
relating to the unpublished “Key to All Mythologies.” It is about this
that he is proud, jealous, sore, and apprehensive. What he imagines that
the Brasenose men will think of it is a large part of his social self,
and he suffers hidden joy and torture according as he is hopeful or
despondent of its triumphant publication. When he finds that his body
must die his chief thought is how to keep this alive, and he attempts to
impose its completion upon poor Dorothea, who is a pale shadow in his
life compared with the Key, a mere instrument to minister to this
fantastic ego. So if one, turning the leaves of history, could evoke the
real selves of all the men of thought, what a strange procession they
would be!—outlandish theories, unintelligible and forgotten creeds,
hypotheses once despised but now long established, or _vice versa_—all
conceived eagerly, jealously, devotedly, as the very heart of the self.
There is no class more sensitive and none, not even the insane, in whom
self-feeling attaches to such singular and remote conceptions. An
astronomer may be indifferent when you depreciate his personal
appearance, abuse his relatives, or question his pecuniary honesty; but
if you doubt that there are artificial canals on Mars you cut him to the
quick. And poets and artists of every sort have always and with good
reason been regarded as a _genus irritabile_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account