Human nature and the social orderCooley, Charles Horton
Science
Human nature and the social order
Cooley, Charles Horton
Individualism; Social psychology; Sociology
Naturally non-conformity is characteristic of the more energetic states
of the human mind. Men of great vigor are sure to be non-conformers in
some important respect; youth glories in non-conformity, while age
usually comes back to the general point of view. “Men are conservatives
when they are least vigorous, or when they are most luxurious. They are
conservatives after dinner, or before taking their rest; when they are
sick or aged. In the morning, or when their intellect or their
conscience has been aroused, when they hear music, or when they read
poetry, they are radicals.”[78]
The rational attitude of the individual toward the question of
conformity or non-conformity in his own life, would seem to be: assert
your individuality in matters which you deem important; conform in those
you deem unimportant. To have a conspicuously individual way of doing
everything is impossible to a sane person, and to attempt it would be to
do one’s self a gratuitous injury, by closing the channels of sympathy
through which we partake of the life around us. We should save our
strength for matters in regard to which persistent conviction impels us
to insist upon our own way.
Society, like every living, advancing whole, requires a just union of
stability and change, uniformity and differentiation. Conformity is the
phase of stability and uniformity, while non-conformity is the phase of
differentiation and change. The latter cannot introduce anything wholly
new, but it can and does effect such a reorganization of existing
material as constantly to transform and renew human life.
I mean by rivalry a competitive striving urged on by the desire to win.
It resembles conformity in that the impelling idea is usually a sense of
what other people are doing and thinking, and especially of what they
are thinking of us: it differs from it chiefly in being more aggressive.
Conformity aims to keep up with the procession, rivalry to get ahead of
it. The former is moved by a sense of the pains and inconveniences of
differing from other people, the latter by an eagerness to compel their
admiration. Winning, to the social self, usually means conspicuous
success in making some desired impression upon other minds, as in
becoming distinguished for power, wealth, skill, culture, beneficence,
or the like.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account