Economic development -- Social aspects; Social evolution; Social problems; Work
The lower the creature the less its organic specialisation. There are
some so indeterminate and undivided that they do not know their heads
from their tails; cut them in two and they promptly produce a new head
and a new tail and go about their business as before. This beast is a
fine example for the “all-around man.”
The higher the creature the more specialised. The more worthily a part
fulfils one function the less worthily it can fulfil others. When the
paw becomes a hand it ceases to be a paw. The more fit the hand for a
hand’s use the less fit for a foot’s use. It would in no way benefit the
body to have a set of loose, interchangeable organs capable of doing a
little of everything and nothing very well. An “all-around” organ would
not be as valuable as any single-hearted servant that gives its one
regular contribution to the body’s good.
So in the social organism, our line of progress has been from the
“all-around” savage to the absolutely one-sided activity of the
specialised workman who contributes his best efforts to one line of
service. “To learn to do one thing and do it well” is what makes the
great artist, the great scientist, the great preacher, the great
mechanic, the great electrician. Social service requires the steadily
increasing specialisation of its constituents.
When you want a dentist you want to find him in his office, with the
accumulated skill of long study and constant practice; you do not want
to wait for him to come in from the plough and wash his hands. All this
we know well enough, and yet we recognise the injurious effects _to the
individual_ of the kind of specialisation we see about us, and have not
yet been able to reconcile the two.
If the individual is injured there must be evil somewhere, that is quite
true. No society can prosper at the expense of its constituents. If the
individual is reduced in physical strength and health, in personal
happiness, or in the best social usefulness by his work, the process he
is engaged in must be abnormal. Now let us see whether the evils so
conspicuous in the lives of our highly specialised workers to-day are
inherent in their degree of specialisation, or whether they are
coincident rather than consequent and due to quite other causes.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account