Economic development -- Social aspects; Social evolution; Social problems; Work
The demand for happiness is perfectly healthy and right, but we are
mistaken as to the means. Every possible impression receivable by the
human sensorium is merely an incentive to _expression_. We are
transmitters of energy, not vats for storage. Our capacity for storage
is merely to give us wider and longer range in our discharge. The living
force of the Universe is pushing through man, and as that force is
greater than he, so is the joy of doing greater than the joy of having.
“It is more blessed to give than to receive.” Of _course_!
Let us study some of the practical results of this false concept of
ours. One of the most exquisitely sublimated extremes of its action is
seen in our distinctively human practice of what is called “collecting.”
It is bewildering at first. That a squirrel should collect nuts, and, on
the same line, that Pharaoh should collect wheat, or that the housewife
should collect food in advance, is all “natural.” That anyone should
collect that “greatest common denominator,” money, is the same tendency
as above. But that a human creature should collect a vast supply of
objects which he does not use, never intends to use, and could not use
if he wanted to, is truly remarkable.
The objects may be of use to other people—if they had them—as in
innumerable pieces of china, but of no use to him; or they may be of no
use to anybody, like defaced postage-stamps—but that does not affect the
collecting instinct. This depraved appetite, seeking to acquire for
personal “ownership” without even the excuse of consumption, frankly
waiving the pleasure of using the things and affixing that pleasure
solely to the getting and having of them, is as morbid a process as
could well be imagined. It is “the mania for owning things” in full
delirium.
What is the normal law of ownership? It is simple, like all natural
laws.
Social processes are served through the social body, through a great
number of detached mechanical structures. The social functionaries, in
order to carry on their functions, must have a certain extra-physical
environment. The family and the individuals therein must have homes, the
body must have its clothes, the worker of all sorts must have his tools,
his shop, all that is necessary for his work. Society requires of the
individual the performance of certain functions. That performance
requires the continuous use of certain mechanical adjuncts. Society must
guarantee to the individual the continuous possession of those adjuncts,
of the things necessary for him to do his work. That is the social
“right of property.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account