Economic development -- Social aspects; Social evolution; Social problems; Work
_Duty of improvement for individual and race. Effect of Ego concept.
Collective nature of Christianity—“‘our’ daily bread.” Unity of man.
“Kingdom of Heaven.” First human duty to assume right functional
relation to Society. Right social relation tends to develop all virtues,
to eliminate all sins. Want Theory and theft corollary. Normal
distribution prevents abnormal acquisition. Sins against property and
person. Thieving produced by clot of wealth. Right organic relation. End
of “the wolf,” of “our” sins, of unnecessary diseases. Twofold duty—to
change concepts and conditions. Public school and library. Social debt
to the worker. Malthusian doctrine. True law of increase in population.
Natural selection among individuals. Difference in organic development.
Artificial selection. Stirpiculture. Superior methods of social
improvement. Poverty increases number of births, but decreases quality.
“Individuation is in inverse proportion to reproduction.” Splendid
opportunities. Two roads to health. Right condition—right action.
General cause of local evil. The home, effect on social consciousness.
Better housing. Way to growth. Human nature. Happiness._
XVII
THE TRUE POSITION
To be—to re-be—and to be better, none can deny this order of duties; and
the last is the highest.
To become better as individuals has long been preached to us; to become
better as a race is no unnatural proposition. Heretofore, the Ego
concept ruling, we have supposed that this was only to be done by
improving as many individuals as possible. And as individual conduct,
ego-guided, consisted in each doing things for his own benefit, here and
hereafter; our improvement has been somewhat hesitant and tortuous, both
in person and in race. It is really singular to see how the Ego concept
has held us from understanding what was best in our religion. The one
great advantage of Christianity over Buddhism, or Mohammedanism, is in
its radical _collectivity_. As far as a pure monotheism goes—the
constant worship and service of God, the Mohammedan is beyond us. As far
as a pure morality goes—an exalted sinlessness, the Buddhist is beyond
us.
But none of them prays: “Give us each day our daily bread.” Now is it
not, truly, a strange thing that we should have been taught that prayer
for two thousand years, and yet every man Jack of us goes forth stoutly,
to get his own private and personal daily bread as rapidly as possible?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account