Economic development -- Social aspects; Social evolution; Social problems; Work
The individual consciousness of men is not denied, it is that,
misconstrued, which has made these common social functions work so ill,
and hurt so in the working. To that same individual consciousness this
book is directed, urging reconsideration of the facts, readjustment of
the industrial activities. But however conscious, men are none the less
“organs,” their labours serve our common ends; not their own. It is not
that each man has some exact analogue in physiological type, like the
heart, but that each industry holds organic relations with all other
industries, and that the use and purpose of each depend on the others.
The need to be supplied is a social need, the growth to be attained is a
social growth, of no more value to an individual, detached, than beating
would be to a heart, detached. Work is an organic function,
incontrovertibly.
As to the lack of social provision of nourishment, this again is but an
error. The provision is there, the whole of society contributing to it;
the circulation is there, our food and other goods flowing merrily
across land and sea; but there is some trouble with the final
distribution of this nourishment to the workers, which will be
considered later. Admitting the imperfections, it remains true that the
social circulation is now in action—the shoemaker of Massachusetts
eating the beef of Nebraska, and the beef-raiser of Nebraska wearing the
shoes of Massachusetts.
No man could work, which is a social function, if he had at the same
time to “take care of himself,” which is an individual function. As a
worker in society, he is taken care of, but he does not do it himself.
To repeat our definition—normal human work is a discharge of social
energy along lines of special development. The social organism lives in
the fulfilment of its organic functions, that fulfilment is work; to
work is to take part in the vital processes of Society, to be socially
alive; not to work, not to take part in these vital processes, is to be
one of three things: First, mere dead matter, Waste; second, a Parasite,
active as a thief, passive as a pauper; or third, a Disease, of which in
time Society must die.
With the waste products of society we are painfully familiar, the great
army of defectives, people who cannot work, yet whom, as part of
ourself, we must support, a drag upon the Social resources. The active
parasite we know in his crude form, as the little thief, and are
beginning to detect in his highly developed form as the big thief. The
passive parasite we know also in his crude form as the idle poor, and
are beginning to suspect in the idle rich. But the disease is still
beyond our diagnosis, though many Societies have died of it, those
morbid processes engendered by the presence in the social body of any
matter not alive and healthily active.
These features of the abnormal working of Society come later. Let us now
study the evolution of Work.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account