Humanism and America : $b Essays on the outlook of modern civilisation
Philosophy
Humanism and America : $b Essays on the outlook of modern civilisation
Humanism; Literature -- Philosophy; Philosophy, Modern; United States -- Civilization -- 20th century
“Hope till Hope creates
From its own wreck the thing it contemplates,”
confessed in the end:
“Alas! I have nor hope nor health,
Nor peace within nor calm around.”
Very beautiful are these rainbow visions--but they are conjured out of
night.
II
Let us turn to a second sort of hope--the hope of an American paradise
of nature. Although the paradise of nature appears in Vergil, in
Renaissance pastorals by Lyly, Sidney, and Spenser, in Perdita’s
shepherd home and in the sylvan cave of Cymbeline’s sons, its use
was mainly either decorative or allegorical until the eighteenth
century. In 1711 Shaftesbury proclaimed the natural man benevolent,
compassionate, and altruistic; and as such he appears in _Ossian_. Pope
said, “The state of Nature was the reign of God.” Rousseau broadcast
the doctrine that civilisation had tended to corrupt the morals of
mankind, while he described the enchanting life of man in a natural
paradise. Cowper united literary simplicity, religious emotionalism,
and the naturalistic humanitarianism of Rousseau. Burns glorified the
simple peasant close to nature. And Coleridge and Southey dreamed
fondly of an American Pantisocracy--“A Dell of Peace and Equality”--on
the banks of the Susquehanna. In 1771, Philip Freneau, our first man
of letters, deriving his radical democracy and his devotion to the
indigenous scene from naturalism, envisaged “The Rising Glory of
America”:
“A new Jerusalem, sent down from heaven,
Shall grace our happy earth, ...
Thence called _Millennium_. Paradise anew
Shall flourish, by no second Adam lost ...
No tempting serpent to allure the soul
From native innocence.”
Indeed, it is interesting to speculate upon the extent to which
this English romantic faith in the “native innocence” of mankind,
transplanted to the inexhaustible resources of the American frontier,
has under these unique conditions furnished philosophic sanction
for an unbridled materialism which has become so characteristically
national. Frontier isolation tended to breed self-confidence, equality,
self-reliance, optimism, contempt for artificial distinctions and a
dependence upon the material world. Crèvecœur in 1782 defined “an
American” as a “new man who acts upon new principles.”
“We have no princes, for whom we toil, starve, and bleed: we are
the most perfect society now existing in the world. Here man is
free as he ought to be.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account