Humanism and America : $b Essays on the outlook of modern civilisation
Philosophy
Humanism and America : $b Essays on the outlook of modern civilisation
Humanism; Literature -- Philosophy; Philosophy, Modern; United States -- Civilization -- 20th century
This is, of course, an unsubtilised outright statement of romantic
æstheticism. Mr. Spingarn was positive that the critic’s essential
response to a work of art must be æsthetic, but he has always withheld
what exactly he means by the æsthetic emotion or response or judgment.
(It _is_ hard to make concrete statements about the so-called æsthetic
emotion.) But that did not in the least militate against the “æsthetic
response” being used as a campaign catchword. For Mr. Spingarn had
written the proclamations for a new generation of American writers.
This is the curious phenomenon I spoke of. One is astonished not just
at the slight quantity of Mr. Spingarn’s writing in proportion to his
reputation, but more astonished at the complete lack of originality
in the documents of this apostle for originality. He added nothing
to the Crocean doctrine: he clarified nothing or modified nothing
in it. He did not even apply it, abstaining, then and since, from
concrete criticism of individual works. He merely proclaimed it. And a
widespread revolt against standards followed in American criticism. So
hearty, and eventually so wilful and silly, was the revolt that in 1922
its opponents were entertained by the issuance from Mr. Spingarn of a
restraining manifesto entitled _The Younger Generation_. This time,
recoiling from the destructiveness of the young men, Mr. Spingarn would
herd them back into an idealistic fold, back to “discipline, character,
morals, imagination, beauty, freedom.” Very often before, romantic
expansiveness has run its course into disillusion: it is a soberer
Crocean who said, “I, who once called upon young men for rebellion and
doubt, now call upon them for thought and faith.”
It is not Mr. J. E. Spingarn, enthusiastic amateur of letters, trained
scholar, man of feeling, who can detain us, for there is literally
nothing in his writing for the mind to work on: as a thinker, he is
thoroughly derivative and weak on definitions. But what Mr. Spingarn
stands for, the theory of self-expression, still needs a scotching.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account