[67] A perusal of the _Life and Letters of Stuart P. Sherman_, published after this essay was written, increases my confidence in the diagnosis above of Sherman’s weaknesses. Mr. P. E. More wondered many years ago whether his young reviewer did not have “an inclination to avoid the central problem.” Later, he warned Sherman: “I do not like to see a man of your ability and insight deliberately taking up the job of whitewasher” for democracy. And finally Mr. More said: “Yours is but a sickly sort of democracy at bottom, and needs a doctor.” [68] From _Prejudices: Fourth Series_, Alfred A. Knopf, publisher. [69] From _The Modern Temper_, Harcourt, Brace & Co., publisher. [70] Mr. Lippmann is not a literary critic but his views are pertinent to this discussion. [71] The Macmillan Company, publisher. [72] Even in a footnote I mention Mr. Ludwig Lewisohn with some reluctance, and only because there are so few critics among us who have any interest in trying to plot a direction for the future. Pauline Christianity (grossly libelled by him as akin to the degenerate puritanism of our day) must be destroyed, he preaches. Salvation lies in a fusion of Hellenism (Science) and Judaism (which he interprets selectively and sentimentally). He is a suggestive writer: he is also a prig, a special pleader, and embarrassing in his frequent intervals of self-pity and in his intrusions of hearth-side intimacies (proper for telling only to his closest friends) into the public medium of print. One cannot take this muddled romanticist seriously. [73] In _Style and Form in American Prose_ (1929). _Behaviour and Continuity_ BERNARD BANDLER II I