Hungarian literature : $b An historical & critical surveyReich, Emil
History
Hungarian literature : $b An historical & critical survey
Reich, Emil
Hungarian literature -- History and criticism
These reflections are suggested by a consideration of the works of
Francis Kölcsey (1790-1838), a really great orator and a good poet. Born
in the county of Bihar, where he spent the best part of his short life,
he employed his magnificent powers of oratory chiefly in inculcating
in the Hungarians of his time the lesson of patriotism. There can be
no doubt that his speeches, his lofty “_Paraenesis_,” and some of his
critical work are written in that gorgeously laborious style which has
made the fame of Bossuet in France and Gibbon in England. His poems
breathe a mild melancholy that gives them a sombre tint of peculiar
beauty. Yet, on the whole, he never oversteps the narrow limits of Magyar
life as then existent; and what appeals to men of all countries and all
nations found but a feeble rhetorical echo in his writings. No young
Hungarian can read his works without deep emotion. In maturer years,
however, he finds that Kölcsey’s works belong to those that one gladly
remembers to have read once, without desiring to read them again.
The growth of Hungarian Literature from 1772 to 1825 was, compared to
that of England from 1570 to 1620; of Germany from 1760 to 1805; or of
France from 1630 to 1675, a slow one. Many of the Hungarian writers of
that period were endowed with gifts of no common calibre; and some of
them, such as Kazinczy, Kisfaludy, Csokonai, Berzsenyi, Kölcsey, can
certainly not be denied the distinction of genius. Yet with all their
efforts, individual or collective, they did not quicken the step of
literary progress very considerably. This was owing to the fact, that
Hungary had as yet no literary centres, such as England possessed in
London; France in Paris; and Germany in Berlin, Leipsic or Weimar. Nearly
all the poets and other writers so far mentioned lived in small towns
scattered over the country, and, from the lack of good communications,
were practically isolated from one another. Kazinczy lived in the county
of Zemplén; Kölcsey in the county of Bihar; Kisfaludy, Berzsenyi, Ádám
Horváth in the cis-Danubian counties. There were, it is true, some
literary centres in Pesth; such as the house of the able folk-poet
Vitkovics. But they were few, and Pesth was, as yet, not a great capital.
Literature needs local concentration of high-strung people. Country life
gives the aptitude for poetic work; intense urban life alone ripens that
aptitude into creative talent. Virgil at Mantua, or Cicero at Arpinum
would have remained sterile provincials. The great mental agitation set
in motion by the writers in Magyar above mentioned was given additional
fuel by a very large number of Hungarians writing in Latin and French.
The ideas of the French and German Rationalism (“_Aufklaerung_”) of that
time were eagerly seized upon, elaborated and discussed in over five
hundred works and pamphlets treating of Religion, Politics, Law and
Philosophy. Hungary was thus during that period (1772-1825), instinct
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account