Hungarian literature : $b An historical & critical surveyReich, Emil
History
Hungarian literature : $b An historical & critical survey
Reich, Emil
Hungarian literature -- History and criticism
At once a few of them became the “standard” novelists.
Nobody wanted to hear of any other. By this means the rise of other,
perhaps greater novelists, was retarded, if not altogether foreclosed;
and the “standard” man, eagerly seizing on the great favour bestowed upon
him, poured forth scores of novels, irrespective of the higher demands
of Art. The consequence was that he deteriorated. For one good novel he
gave ten bad ones. Having a sort of literary monopoly, he did not heed
adverse criticism. The public, on the other hand, did not care to learn
of a new novelist, and, as actually happened in Hungary, almost entirely
neglected a real genius for no other reason than that mental laziness,
which in countries with less abundant literature is perhaps one of the
most baneful of obstacles to the success of a writer.
The preceding remarks appear to be necessary for a right appreciation
of Hungarian novels. Foreign readers, and perhaps more especially the
English, are apt to admire in Hungarian novels such qualities as strike
them as new and “weird,” because German, French, or English novelists
do not excel in them. Thus foreign readers will easily be impressed,
and in many cases unduly so, by the great picturesqueness of Hungarian
novelists. This quality, commendable though it no doubt is, will induce
many a foreign critic to overrate the value of this or that Hungarian
novel. In Hungary, picturesque turns of phrases are of the very
commonest. They do not strike a Hungarian critic as being particularly
meritorious. Hence the reader of the present work must not be astonished
at some of the subsequent severe judgments passed on Hungarian novelistic
celebrities. Far from trying to deter English or French readers from
the reading of such novels as they will find criticised adversely, we
would rather advise them to enjoy those novels without further regard to
the views of the writer. We have in so criticising of necessity placed
ourselves on a basis rather Magyar than European, and we are fully aware
of the marked difference in taste to be found in the various nations
of Europe. If the novelists and poets of one nation were to be judged
by the taste of another, Thackeray could hardly be regarded as a great
novelist, and Tennyson scarcely as a great poet. Yet both are in England
recognized as two of the best writers in English literature.
Of the great novelists of Hungary, four stand out as peculiarly
excellent. Their names are Nicolas Jósika; Joseph Eötvös; Sigismund
Kemény; and Maurus Jókai. The first three belong to the class of
Magnates, being Barons; the last is a commoner by birth. It is rather
curious, that the Magnates, who have in the present century given no poet
of the first order to Hungary, should in the field of Hungarian novel
writing have furnished three writers of the first rank, of whom one,
Baron Kemény, has done work not unworthy of the greatest novel-writer of
the century.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account