Hungarian literature : $b An historical & critical surveyReich, Emil
History
Hungarian literature : $b An historical & critical survey
Reich, Emil
Hungarian literature -- History and criticism
The same great qualities of linguistic _verve_ and intense poetic
sentiment are to be found in the other epical poems of Arany. In the
“Death of Buda” (_Buda halála_, 1864), he sings the legendary story
of Attila’s murder of his own brother Buda (Bleda). In this exquisite
epic Attila (or Etele, as Arany calls him), is pictured as a hero of
the magnificent type, and nothing could be more removed from the poet’s
“Etele,” than the conventional or historic Attila. Tragical energy and
incomparable language render this poem one of intense charm. It was
intended for one of three great epics narrating the cycle of Hun legends;
of the other two we have only fragments. The romantic story of Wesselényi
and Mary Szécsi (see page 58), was made into a charming epic by Arany,
under the title “The capture of Murány” (“_Murány ostroma_,” 1849). In
“The Gypsies of Nagy Ida” (“_A nagyidai czigányok_,” 1852), Arany gave
vent, in form of a satirical burlesque, to his profound sorrow over his
country’s decadence, after the suppression of the liberal movement in
1848-1849. His ballads are generally considered to represent the best
specimens of Magyar ballad-writing. It must certainly be conceded that
few ballad-writers, whether in or outside Hungary, have so completely
hit the true ballad-tone, or internal ring of thought and word adapted
to subjects so utterly out of keeping with our modern sentiment. It
may be doubted whether Chopin himself in his ballad in F major has so
felicitously intuned the lay of olden romance as has Arany in his mostly
sombre ballads, such as “Duel at midnight” (“_Éjféli párbaj_”), “Knight
Pázmán” (“_Pázmán lovag_”), “Marfeast” (“_Ünneprontók_”). As in the best
English or German ballads, events are, as a rule, only indicated, not
described, and hurry on to their fatal termination with terrible speed.
All is action and fierce movement.
In addition to his activity as a creative poet, Arany also did much
for the introduction of foreign and classical literature into Hungary
by way of translations. His most successful work in that line were the
translations of several dramas of Shakespeare (_Hamlet_, _Midsummer
Night’s Dream_, _King John_), and more especially still his most
exquisite (—_pace_ all the German philologists!—) translation of the
comedies of Aristophanes.
We ought now to devote a considerable space to a poet who, in his time,
was generally associated with Petőfi and Arany. We mean Michael Tompa
(1817-1868). While it is now impossible to rank Tompa with either Petőfi
or Arany, he yet occupies a very conspicuous place in Magyar literature.
His intense love of nature, his profound religious sentiment, and his
fine humour entitle him to be considered as foremost amongst the lesser
lyrical glories of Hungary. We can only regret that we cannot give here
more than this bare indication of the peculiar individuality of the
author of the “Flower-fables” (_Virágregék_).
CHAPTER XXIX.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account