Hungarian literature : $b An historical & critical surveyReich, Emil
History
Hungarian literature : $b An historical & critical survey
Reich, Emil
Hungarian literature -- History and criticism
It is even so with the world of peasantry in Hungary or in Austria. How
silly of some painfully enlightened people to ascribe, for instance, the
mass of prejudice and superstition in the Hungarian or German peasantry
to a lack of that “_Bildung_” or school-knowledge which is acquired
through books and bookmen! The current belief in witches, fairies, imps
and such-like elf-folk, good and bad, grows with the peasantry of those
countries, out of the same roots that nourish in the “higher classes”
the craving for and the delight in fairy operas and fantastic novels.
Each social “world” demands pleasures and distractions of the same kind;
each satisfying that craving in a different manner. The urban gentleman
and lady while away tedious winter evenings by visits to theatres, where
unlikely, demoniac and over-exciting pieces are an everyday occurrence.
The peasants in Hungary have no such theatres; yet long winter evenings
hang just as heavily on their hands. They therefore while away their
leisure-hours by stories fantastic and demoniac, the literal belief
in which must needs grow in direct proportion to the lack of all
theatrical stage environment. As with superstitions, so it is with all
the other great social needs. The Hungarian peasant, when outraged in
his sentiments, does not, it is true, fight a duel like the gentleman.
Yet he, too, becomes a duellist, retiring into the woods, and fighting
society at large as a “_szegény legény_” or brigand. _Plus cela change,
plus c’est la même chose._
It will now be perhaps somewhat clearer that the Hungarian peasantry,
_qua_ peasantry, lends itself to dramatization in the same way as
does any other of the “worlds of men.” The common humanity of men is
to be found in that peasantry too; but it is modified, coloured, and
discoloured, “timbred” and attuned in a different mood. It admits of
tragedies proper; of comedies; and of burlesques. It is Szigligeti’s
great merit to have discovered this new dramatic ore. Without in the
least trying to diminish his glory, we cannot but add, that through the
great revolution coming over Hungary as over the rest of Europe, in the
period from the third to the seventh decade of this century, a revolution
social no less than political, the peculiar and distinct character of
the world of peasants became, by contrast to the rising _bourgeoisie_
and the changing nobility, much more easily discernible than it had been
ever before in Hungary. Yet Szigligeti was the first to seize on that
dramatic _res nullius_; and both for this discovery and the excellent
specimens of folk-dramas which he wrote, he deserves all credit. His most
remarkable folk-dramas are: “The Deserter” (“_Szökött Katona_,” 1843);
“The _Csikós_” (1846); and “The Foundling” (“_Lelencz_,” 1863).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account