Davis, Owen, 1874-1956; Dramatists, American -- Biography
I wrote a melodrama called HER MARRIAGE VOW in three days, many years
ago, and it played three years. On the other hand, I worked eleven
months on THE NERVOUS WRECK. Time doesn’t mean a thing. Any good
newspaper man will tell you that if he couldn’t turn out three thousand
words of copy a day he couldn’t hold his job. A play is seldom more than
twenty-one thousand words, seven days’ work if you want it to be, seven
years’ work if it happens to come that way.
As a matter of fact, I figure that it takes me one hundred hours to
write a play, which, of course, can be one hour a day for one hundred
days, or ten hours a day for ten days; but please note that my trick is
never to start writing until I have solved every problem, drawn every
character and completely laid out my story line. The trick of carrying
all this in your mind with absolutely no notes to fall back upon is
rather a difficult one to master, but it is, I am sure, of great value.
What really happens is that in the course of the weeks you go about with
this junk shifting about in your head, the sub-conscious part of your
mind does most of your work for you, and when you start to write it out
you will be amazed to read what your own hand has written.
When I am writing, I make it a rule to go over my story fully in my mind
just before I go to sleep and to start writing the next morning before I
have read my mail or even the morning papers. Very often points are
clear to me that were clouded the night before, and I find that the part
of my mind that remained active while I slept has been helping me to pay
the rent.
There is a great difference between inspiration and imagination, and
although I believe in inspired writing—that is, I believe that some men
and women upon some fortunate occasion write from an emotional prompting
deeper and finer than their conscious mind could inspire—I do not
confuse the mental pictures of an imaginative mind with so exalted a
word. There are and always have been two sorts of writers, the writer
who tells what he sees, or has read or thought or been told, and the
writer whose mind is a sort of old-fashioned kaleidoscope that forms
little mental pictures quite without conscious effort. In other words,
one writer uses trained observation, and the other has the gift of
spontaneous creation. I have on several occasions seen the story line of
an entire play laid out before me in one flash at a time when I, to the
best of my knowledge, was not thinking of any such thing at all. I can,
on a bet, at any time close my eyes and shake my head and look up and
tell a story that, so far as I can discover, I have never for a moment
thought of before.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account