Davis, Owen, 1874-1956; Dramatists, American -- Biography
Sidney Howard, Max Anderson and, in melodrama, Bayard Veiller know their
business better than he does, but O’Neill’s plays come from deeper down,
not deeper in his brain as some people think, but from the depths of the
particularly sensitive heart of a particularly sensitive man. So,
leaving genius aside, I think courage the quality most valuable to the
man or woman who expects to win a place in the very odd world of the
theater where there are no standards at all, either mental, moral or
ethical, and where the author must of necessity stand alone against
groups with different and antagonistic interests. From the moment an
author signs a contract for the production of a play until that play has
lived its life on the stage, gone through its course of stock company
and foreign productions and been sold “down the river” and turned into a
moving picture, every single hand that comes in contact with that play
is the hand of a potential enemy. The manager and his staff, the actors
in a group, the scenic artists and the technical departments all have
the power and as a rule they desire to put in a little something by way
of change, something usually that will be to their advantage and
destructive to the best quality of the work.
This of course means fight. An author surely might as well fight and be
licked as to be licked without fighting, and the method adopted by the
experienced street fighter of getting in the first punch is most
earnestly recommended. There is to all these groups but one real hope in
any play—the hope that the author wrote something; if he did, they all,
manager, actor, etc., have a chance for success; if he didn’t they
haven’t. Authors of plays, like dentists, are never popular; nobody
really likes to have them around.
Writers are so different in their method that I hesitate to advise a
course that has been very useful to me, that is to vary the form of
writing often enough to escape the boredom that follows walking over the
same path too frequently. I like to follow a heavy drama with a farce,
and a light comedy with a melodrama. Of course, one man usually writes
one form of play better than he does another; yet even in an age of
specialists, the good marksman should learn to handle all the tools of
his trade, and no man can write deep drama without a sense of comedy,
and most assuredly can’t write farce without a definite note of tragedy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account