Iamblichus' Life of Pythagoras, or Pythagoric Life: Accompanied by Fragments of the Ethical Writings of certain Pythagoreans in the Doric dialect; and a collection of Pythagoric Sentences from Stobaeus and others, which are omitted by Gale in his Opuscula Mythologica, and have not been noticed by any editorIamblichus
Philosophy
Iamblichus' Life of Pythagoras, or Pythagoric Life: Accompanied by Fragments of the Ethical Writings of certain Pythagoreans in the Doric dialect; and a collection of Pythagoric Sentences from Stobaeus and others, which are omitted by Gale in his Opuscula Mythologica, and have not been noticed by any editor
Iamblichus
Ethics, Ancient; Philosophers -- Greece -- Biography; Philosophy, Ancient; Pythagoras; Pythagoras and Pythagorean school
Conformably likewise to the precepts of their master, the Pythagoreans
always rose from bed before the rising of the sun; and never wore a ring
in which the image of God was engraved. They also carefully observed to
adore the rising sun, and avoided wearing a ring of the above mentioned
description, lest they should have it about them at funerals, or in some
impure place. In a similar manner, they were attentive to the mandate of
Pythagoras, not to do any thing without previous deliberation and
disquisition; but to form a plan in the morning of what ought to be done
[in the course of the day,] and at night to call to mind the actions of
the day, by this means at one and the same time exploring their conduct,
and exercising their memory. Thus too, they observed the precept, that
if any one of their associates appointed to meet them at a certain
place, they should stay there till he came through the day and the
night; in this again, the Pythagoreans being accustomed to remember what
was said, and not to speak casually. In short Pythagoras ordered them to
be attentive to order and method as long as they lived, and not to
blaspheme at the time of death, but to die with propitious words, such
as are used by those who are sailing out of port into the Adriatic
sea.[54]
The kindred of the Pythagoreans however, were indignant that the
Pythagoreans gave their right hand to those of their own sect alone,
their parents excepted; and that they shared their possessions with each
other in common, but excluded their relations from this fellowship, as
if they were strangers. These, therefore, becoming the sources of the
dissension, the rest readily fell into hostility against the
Pythagoreans. Hippasus, also, Diodorus and Theages said at the same
time, that every citizen ought to be a partaker of the magistracy and
the assembly, and that the rulers should give an account of their
conduct, to those who were elected by lot for this purpose from the
multitude. But the Pythagoreans, Alcimachus, Dimachus, Meton and
Democedes opposed this, and persevered in prohibiting the dissolution of
the polity derived from their ancestors. Those however, who patronized
the multitude, subdued the other party. The multitude therefore, being
assembled together, Cylon and Ninon who were rhetoricians accused the
Pythagoreans. And of these, one belonged to the class of the rich, but
the other was a plebeian. They also divided their harangues between
themselves. But of these harangues, the longer being delivered by Cylon,
Ninon concluded, pretending that he had explored the arcana of the
Pythagoreans, and that he had connected and committed to writing such
particulars as were especially calculated to criminate the Pythagoreans,
and giving a book to ascribe, he ordered him to read it. But the book
was inscribed _the Sacred Discourse_. And the following is a specimen of
what it contained: Friends are to be venerated in the same manner as the
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account