Idle Ideas in 1905Jerome, Jerome K. (Jerome Klapka)
General
Idle Ideas in 1905
Jerome, Jerome K. (Jerome Klapka)
English essays; English wit and humor
To expect a boy to love learning and culture is like expecting him to
prefer old vintage claret to gooseberry wine. Culture for the majority
is an acquired taste. Speaking personally, I am entirely in agreement
with the University professor. I find knowledge, prompting to
observation and leading to reflection, the most satisfactory luggage with
which a traveller through life can provide himself. I would that I had
more of it. To be able to enjoy a picture is of more advantage than to
be able to buy it.
All that the University professor can urge in favour of idealism I am
prepared to endorse. But then I am—let us say, thirty-nine. At fourteen
my candid opinion was that he was talking “rot.” I looked at the old
gentleman himself—a narrow-chested, spectacled old gentleman, who lived
up a by street. He did not seem to have much fun of any sort. It was
not my ideal. He told me things had been written in a language called
Greek that I should enjoy reading, but I had not even read all Captain
Marryat. There were tales by Sir Walter Scott and “Jack Harkaway’s
Schooldays!” I felt I could wait a while. There was a chap called
Aristophanes who had written comedies, satirising the political
institutions of a country that had disappeared two thousand years ago. I
say, without shame, Drury Lane pantomime and Barnum’s Circus called to me
more strongly.
Wishing to give the old gentleman a chance, I dipped into translations.
Some of these old fellows were not as bad as I had imagined them. A
party named Homer had written some really interesting stuff. Here and
there, maybe, he was a bit long-winded, but, taking him as a whole, there
was “go” in him. There was another of them—Ovid was his name. He could
tell a story, Ovid could. He had imagination. He was almost as good as
“Robinson Crusoe.” I thought it would please my professor, telling him
that I was reading these, his favourite authors.
“Reading them!” he cried, “but you don’t know Greek or Latin.”
“But I know English,” I answered; “they have all been translated into
English. You never told me that!”
It appeared it was not the same thing. There were subtle delicacies of
diction bound to escape even the best translator. These subtle
delicacies of diction I could enjoy only by devoting the next seven or
eight years of my life to the study of Greek and Latin. It will grieve
the University professor to hear it, but the enjoyment of those subtle
delicacies of diction did not appear to me—I was only fourteen at the
time, please remember—to be worth the time and trouble.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account