Idle Ideas in 1905Jerome, Jerome K. (Jerome Klapka)
General
Idle Ideas in 1905
Jerome, Jerome K. (Jerome Klapka)
English essays; English wit and humor
“It is quite true, my dear girl,” I should say to her, “something is
wrong—very wrong. But it is not the American man. Never you mind the
American man: you leave him to worry out his own salvation. You are not
the girl to put him right, even where he is wrong. And it is not
civilisation. Civilisation has a deal to answer for, I admit: don’t you
load it up with this additional trouble. The thing that is wrong in this
case of yours—if you will forgive my saying so—is you. You make a fool
of yourself; you marry a man who is a mere animal because he appeals to
your animal instincts. Then, like the lady who cried out ‘Alack, I’ve
married a black,’ you appeal to heaven against the injustice of being
mated with a clown. You are not a nice girl, either in your ideas or in
your behaviour. I don’t blame you for it; you did not make yourself.
But when you set to work to attract all that is lowest in man, why be so
astonished at your own success? There are plenty of shocking American
men, I agree. One meets the class even outside America. But nice
American girls will tell you that there are also nice American men.
There is an old proverb about birds of a feather. Next time you find
yourself in the company of a shocking American man, you just ask yourself
how he got there, and how it is he seems to be feeling at home. You
learn self-control. Get it out of your head that you are the centre of
the universe, and grasp the idea that a petticoat is not a halo, and you
will find civilisation not half as wrong as you thought it.”
I know what Miss Sparhawk’s reply would be.
“You say all this to me—to me, a lady? Great Heavens! What has become
of chivalry?”
A Frenchman was once put on trial for murdering his father and mother.
He confessed his guilt, but begged for mercy on the plea that he was an
orphan. Chivalry was founded on the assumption that woman was worthy to
be worshipped. The modern woman’s notion is that when she does wrong she
ought to be excused by chivalrous man because she is a lady.
I like the naughty heroine; we all of us do. The early Victorian
heroine—the angel in a white frock, was a bore. We knew exactly what she
was going to do—the right thing. We did not even have to ask ourselves,
“What will she think is the right thing to do under the circumstances?”
It was always the conventional right thing. You could have put it to a
Sunday school and have got the answer every time. The heroine with
passions, instincts, emotions, is to be welcomed. But I want her to
grasp the fact that after all she is only one of us. I should like her
better if, instead of demanding:
“What is wrong in civilisation? What is the world coming to?” and so
forth, she would occasionally say to herself:
“Guess I’ve made a fool of myself this time. I do feel that ’shamed of
myself.”
She would not lose by it. We should respect her all the more.
WHAT MRS. WILKINS THOUGHT ABOUT IT.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account