Illustrated history of ancient literature, oriental and classicalQuackenbos, John D. (John Duncan)
History
Illustrated history of ancient literature, oriental and classical
Quackenbos, John D. (John Duncan)
Classical literature -- History and criticism; Oriental literature -- History and criticism
Euripides spent the last two years of his life at the Macedonian court,
then the abode of many illustrious men. He went there in search of
rest, but found that he had only exchanged persecution at home for
jealousy abroad. The honors heaped upon him by the Macedonian prince,
together with his own superior genius, raised him up enemies. In the
king’s savage hounds, if we may credit the legend, they saw the means
of removing an obnoxious rival; and while Euripides was walking in his
patron’s garden, he was attacked and fatally mangled by the fierce
brutes (406 B.C.).
Athens felt the loss, and went into mourning at news of his death;
vainly she supplicated the Macedonian king for his ashes. They were
magnificently interred at Pella; while his country was forced to remain
content with a statue, and a cenotaph on which was inscribed, “All
Greece is the monument of Euripides.” His verses, as he predicted, were
immortal; admiration of them led an epigrammatist to write:
“If it be true that in the grave the dead
Have sense and knowledge, as some men have said,
I’d hang myself to see Euripides.”
With Euripides, the glory of the Athenian stage descended into
the tomb; and Tragedy found no one worthy to fill his place till
Shakespeare’s day.
STYLE OF EURIPIDES.—Sophocles once remarked that he represented men
as they ought to be, Euripides as they are. This holding of the mirror
up to nature was what Athenian taste began to demand; Euripides had
the tact to see what was wanted, and the genius to make the innovation
successfully. His heroes and heroines talked and acted like men and
women of the day; hence he has been accused of degrading his art by
introducing the commonplace into his dramas, of lowering Greek tragedy
to the level of every-day life.
A more serious charge also was laid at his door—that of impiety.
Euripides rejected the faith of his fathers; we need not, therefore,
look in his plays for the religious fervor of Æschylus, or even for
the high moral tone of Sophocles. In one of his lines the doctrine of
mental reservation appears,
“My tongue took an oath, but my mind is unsworn”—
a sentiment which led to his prosecution for justifying perjury.
While Euripides was inferior to Æschylus in majesty, to Sophocles
in symmetry and finish, he surpassed both in delineating character,
and particularly in representing the human passions. He was the most
pathetic of the three, and in the portraiture of woman stands second to
no poet, ancient or modern. His heroines are his master-figures. Traces
of art are sometimes apparent in his writings, and occasionally he
verges on the sensational.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account