Illustrated history of ancient literature, oriental and classicalQuackenbos, John D. (John Duncan)
History
Illustrated history of ancient literature, oriental and classical
Quackenbos, John D. (John Duncan)
Classical literature -- History and criticism; Oriental literature -- History and criticism
=Italy Peopled.=—While watching the rise, meridian splendors, and
glowing sunset of Grecian letters, we have left unnoticed the dawn
of literary taste in Italy, the sister of Hellas, peopled, as we
have seen, by kindred Phrygian tribes who spoke dialects of the
Phrygo-Hellenic tongue (p. 133). Whether they were the first of human
kind to wake the echoes of the Italian solitudes, must ever remain a
matter of doubt. Some believe that the Alps had proved an insuperable
barrier to previous emigrants from the East; others, that the
adventurous Pelasgians, on descending their slopes, found a Turanian
population already in possession of the peninsula. If the latter theory
be correct, the Turanian aborigines were speedily overpowered by the
new-comers and became incorporated with their conquerors.
When Rome was founded, 753 B.C., the predominant Italian races were
distinguished as Latin and Umbrian (embracing the Oscans); their
languages were closely related, and have been called _Italic_. The
Etruscans, who lived west of the Tiber, though probably of Aryan
origin, differed in many respects from the Umbrians and Latins.
[Illustration: ANCIENT ITALY and the PLACES NOTED
in the HISTORY of its LITERATURE
[See the above map for the various localities mentioned in connection
with Roman Literature.]]
=The Latin Language=, in its most ancient form, was probably spoken by
the people of Latium at least twelve hundred years before the Christian
Era. For many centuries it remained harsh and unpolished, nor did its
roughness materially wear away until it came in contact with the Greek,
about 250 B.C. Then its vocabulary was enriched, and it gradually
acquired elegance and beauty. A knowledge of Greek came to be regarded
as indispensable to a polite education, and Roman children were taught
this language before their own.
A reaction, however, ultimately set in, and the foisting of foreign
words and idioms on the native tongue was condemned as strongly as it
had once been favored; a strange expression was now compelled to run
the gantlet of merciless criticism before it was admitted as part of
the language. Cæsar advised to shun a new term as one would a reef;
Augustus frankly acknowledged that, though he was emperor of the world,
he could not make a Latin word; and Tiberius was thus pointedly rebuked
by a Roman grammarian for a verbal error: “Thou, O Cæsar! canst confer
Roman citizenship on men, but not on words.”
When the rest of Italy submitted to the arms of Rome, it accepted the
language of the conqueror. Latin also supplanted the Carthaginian
tongue in Africa and Spain, Celtic in Gaul and Britain, and finally was
spoken in greater or less purity throughout the empire.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account