Illustrations of political economy, Volume 3 (of 9)Martineau, Harriet
General
Illustrations of political economy, Volume 3 (of 9)
Martineau, Harriet
Didactic fiction, English; Political fiction, English; Social problems -- Fiction
“Then it would be an investment of capital, and cease to bear any
relation to the question of absenteeism.”
“True, true. But it seems to me that there must be a vast difference
between using your resources to put in motion Irish and French industry.
Have not the French been gainers all this time, and the Irish losers, by
your having employed French workmen? Might not the profits of Irish
work-people in your service have become substantial capital by this
time, if you had staid at home?”
“Ireland has been as busy working for me all this time, Rosso, as if I
had staid at home: not these my near neighbours, perhaps, but labourers
of one kind or another. My revenue must first be spent here before my
agent can get it for me to spend anywhere else. The only difference is
that I myself might spend it in Irish bread, fish, milk, linen, &c.,
while he lays out exactly its equivalent in purchasing that which is to
enable me to buy French bread, milk, fish, and linens; whether that
which he purchases be labour and raw material united in a manufacture,
or raw material which is the result of labour.”
“But the plain question is, after all, Tracey, whether you would have
employed French labour if you had lived at home?”
“I should not, except in as far as I live on French wines; of which you
know I am very fond; but at the same time, I supersede a portion of
French labour by the produce of Irish labour which I introduce into
France. Neither should I have employed more Irish labour at home than
when abroad. The amount of Irish commodities which I should have
consumed at home is exchanged against French commodities; that is all.
It seems to me, Rosso, that since you feel perplexed about this, you
must have the idea that this exchange is not an exchange of equivalents.
Is not that what you are thinking of? You should remember that an
exchange which is advantageous to individuals on account of convenience,
&c. is a mere exchange of equivalents as regards the country at large.
The baker gains by exchanging some of his loaves for broad-cloth; but
the same amount of wealth remains in the country as before. In like
manner, it is a convenience to me to have my rents in money rather than
cattle; but it is the same thing to Ireland whether I receive my revenue
in the one form or the other.”
“True: give me a case. Show me the effect of sending your revenue to
Paris through England.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account