Illustrations of political economy, Volume 4 (of 9)Martineau, Harriet
General
Illustrations of political economy, Volume 4 (of 9)
Martineau, Harriet
Didactic fiction, English; Political fiction, English; Social problems -- Fiction
“The third law,” interrupted Joel, “is that all exchanges of these
fruits ought to be free and voluntary. Let our labourers give something
in exchange for social protection, and welcome; but never tell me that
they would willingly give as much as is now required from them in taxes,
unless food was allowed so to abound as to afford a better recompense to
their toil. While government checks the supply of food, the labourer
cannot think the wealth he creates naturally distributed between the
government and himself.”
“The co-operatives propose, I believe, to go on tilling more and more
land as more food is wanted, and to give a sufficiency of its produce to
every labourer.”
“Aye, madam, and many besides the co-operatives; but it would puzzle the
wisest man among them to say where the sufficiency is to come from,
after a time; the return from land being less and less as time passes
on. Take the worst soil at present tilled....”
“Or a better soil, subtracting the rent; for the return from all land is
equal when the rent is deducted.”
“Very true, madam. The produce is to be shared between the cultivator
and his labourers, rent having nothing to do with the profits of the one
or the wages of the other,—being the consequence entirely of the
different qualities of the land. Well; let this produce be divided into
wages and profits in what proportion you will, both decline as numbers
increase and more food is wanted.”
“How is it then that farmers’ labourers have many things in their
possession that farmers’ labourers used not to have? More shoes and
stockings, and cloth coats, and other manufactured articles?”
“Because these things are more easily made, and cost less. A labourer
may now have a pair of shoes for half as much corn, we will say, as he
must have given for them some years ago. The same is the case with the
farmer who employs him; so, though each may receive double the quantity
of certain goods that they did some years ago, it does not follow that
the rate of profits and wages is increased. If you reckoned the
labourer’s gains in shoes, you might say that his wages are doubled; but
if you reckon them in relation to the farmers’ profits, you may find
them at the same time lowered; or that both wages and profits have in
one sense increased; in another not. This blinds many people to the fact
that wages and profits are continually declining.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account