Illustrations of the Birds of California, Texas, Oregon, British and Russian AmericaCassin, John
Science
Illustrations of the Birds of California, Texas, Oregon, British and Russian America
Cassin, John
Birds -- North America
We have no birds of ill omen, and even the long-defamed Owl has escaped
his usual reputation; not that he is regarded with favor, rather the
reverse; but for other reason than attributed connexion with
supernatural agents; nor is his appearance in the neighborhood of the
farm-house or the settler’s cabin regarded as at all ominous, except of
immediate danger to whatever of the domestic poultry may have attracted
his attention, or in any degree foreboding, unless of his own abrupt
demise in case he happens to be observed by the proprietor, having at
hand his trusty rifle or fowling-piece. The owl takes the greater risk
in such an adventure.
On account, in some measure, of their peculiar forms, particularly their
large heads and staring eyes, their nocturnal habits, and their
habitually resorting in the day-time to secluded haunts in the forest or
other little-frequented localities, no animals have been more invariably
regarded as of evil portent than owls. And in this character they have
found a place in the literature, and especially the poetry, of nearly
all nations ancient and modern. The Latin writers seldom fail to mention
the appearance of the owl among the omens and prodigies which they
frequently enumerate as having preceded disasters to the state or to
distinguished personages. Pliny in his Natural History, gravely devotes
a chapter to Inauspicious Birds, and gives the owl a post of distinction
in this manner: “The owl, a dismal bird, and very much dreaded in public
auguries, inhabits deserts which are not only desolate, but dreary and
inaccessible: it is a monster of night, nor does it possess any voice
but a groan. Thus, when it is seen in towns or in daylight, it is an
omen to be dreaded.” Book x., chapter 12. The poets give him the same
reputation, but perhaps only in the legitimate exercise of their art.
The poet is privileged in the entire domain of nature, and Virgil and
Shakspeare have forever commemorated, though somewhat infamously, the
Owl. The former alludes to it as one of numerous precursors of the death
of Dido:
“Solaque culminibus ferali carmine bubo
Sæpe queri, et longas in fletum ducere voces.”
“Whilst lonely on the roof, night’s bird prolongs
The notes of woe, and shrieks funereal songs.”
Shakspeare uses the Owl in the same capacity of direful portent. Thus
Casca, in allusion to omens preceding the death of Cæsar:
“And yesterday, the bird of night did sit
Even at noon-day upon the market-place
Hooting and shrieking:”
and in Macbeth he introduces its cry as an accompaniment of the murder
of Duncan:
“Hark! Peace! It was the owl that shrieked,
The fatal bellman, which giv’st the stern’st good-night.
He is about it:”
and again in Henry the Sixth:
“The owl shriek’d at thy birth; an evil sign;
The night-crow cried, aboding luckless time,
Dogs howl’d, and hideous tempests shook down trees.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account