Illustrations of the Croton AqueductTower, F. B. (Fayette Bartholomew)
History
Illustrations of the Croton Aqueduct
Tower, F. B. (Fayette Bartholomew)
Croton Aqueduct (N.Y.)
_Croton Water._ _Schuylkill Water._
In 100 gr. in 1 In 100 gr. in 1
parts gall. parts gall.
Carbonate of Lime, 45.86 2.293 53.67 2.190
Carbonate of Magnesia, 18.78 .939 11.87 0.484
Alkaline Carbonates, 16.57 .828 4.53 0.185
Alkaline Chlorides, 3.87 .193 3.75 0.153
Oxide of Iron, 2.21 .110
Silica, 7.18 .359 9.68 0.395
Organic Matter, 5.53 .276 0.88 0.036
------ -----
Parts, 100.00 grs. 4.998
Alumina and Oxide of Iron, 1.88 0.077
Alkaline Sulphates, 13.74 0.560
----- -----
Parts, 100 grs. 4.080
The Croton water was taken from the Croton dam, and when perfectly
clear was found, as appears by the above analysis to contain 4.998,
or about _five_ grains of solid matter to the gallon. The Schuylkill
water was taken from the middle basin on Fair Mount, and contained
4.08 grains of solid matter to the gallon. The Croton differs from
the Schuylkill water in containing a larger amount of the alkaline
carbonates, and of the carbonate of magnesia, while it contains less
carbonate of lime, and is entirely destitute of the alkaline sulphates,
of which the Schuylkill contains 13.74 parts in 100 of the total solid
matters, though amounting to only one half a grain to the gallon.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account