Illustrations of the Huttonian Theory of the EarthPlayfair, John
Science
Illustrations of the Huttonian Theory of the Earth
Playfair, John
Geology; Hutton, James, 1726-1797. Theory of the earth
219. The simultaneous consolidation of the quartz and the metal is
indeed so highly improbable, that the Neptunists rather suppose, that
the ramifications in such specimens as are here alluded to, have been
produced by the metal defusing itself through _rifts_ already formed
in the stone.[115] But it may be answered, that between the channels
in which the metal pervades the quartz, and the ordinary cracks or
fissures in stones, there is no resemblance whatever: That a system of
hollow tubes, winding through a stone, (as the tubes in question, must
have been, according to this hypothesis, before they were filled by
the metal,) is itself far more inconceivable than the thing which it
is intended to explain; and lastly, that if the stone was perforated
by such tubes, it would still be infinite to one that they did not all
exactly join, or inosculate with one another.
[Footnote 115: Geol. Essays, p. 401.]
220. The compenetration, as it may be called, of two heterogeneous
substances, has here furnished a proof of their having been melted by
fire. The inclusion of one heterogeneous substance within another,
as happens among the spars and drusens, found so commonly in mineral
veins, often leads to a similar conclusion. Thus, from a specimen of
chalcedony, including in it a piece of calcareous spar, Dr Hutton
has derived a very ingenious and satisfactory proof, that these two
substances were perfectly soft at the same time, and mutually affected
each other at the moment of their concretion.[116]
[Footnote 116: Theory of the Earth, vol. i. p. 93.]
Each of these substances has its peculiar form, which, when left to
itself, it naturally assumes; the spar taking the form of rhombic
crystals, and the chalcedony affecting a mammalated structure, or a
superficies composed of spherical segments, contiguous to one another.
Now, in the specimen under consideration, the spar is included in the
chalcedony, and the peculiar figure of each is impressed on the other;
the angles and planes of the spar are indented into the chalcedony,
and the spherical segments of the chalcedony are imprinted on the
planes of the spar. These appearances are consistent with no notion of
consolidation that does not involve in it the simultaneous concretion
of the whole mass; and such concretion cannot arise from precipitation
from a solvent, but only from the congelation of a melted body. This
argument, it must be remarked, is not grounded on a solitary specimen,
(though if it were it might still be perfectly conclusive,) but on a
phenomenon of which there are innumerable instances.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account