Illustrations of the Huttonian Theory of the EarthPlayfair, John
Science
Illustrations of the Huttonian Theory of the Earth
Playfair, John
Geology; Hutton, James, 1726-1797. Theory of the earth
230. It is remarked, at § 56, that the shifting of the strata is best
observed where the veins make a transverse section of beds of rock,
considerably inclined to the horizon. It is also true, that in some
cases the near approach of the strata to the level, may make the shifts
produced by the veins very easy to be discovered. Thus in Derbyshire,
where the mineral veins are in secondary strata, nearly horizontal,
there is almost no instance in which the corresponding strata are not
observed to be on different levels, on the opposite sides of the same
vein.
231. The fact described by De Luc, and referred to at § 55, may, for
what we know of it, admit of being explained in two ways. The great
wedge of rock which appears to be insulated between two branches of the
same vein, may either be a mass that has been broken off, and sustained
by the melted matter that flowed all around it; or, it may be a mass
of rock contained between two veins that are in reality distinct, and
of different formation. Whether this last supposition is the truth,
would probably be evident from a careful examination of both parts
of the vein; as some difference of character cannot fail to be the
consequence of different formation. If no such difference is observed,
the two branches must be supposed to belong to the same vein, and the
only probable explanation of the insulation of so large a mass of rock
will be by the first mentioned supposition. This fact, therefore,
notwithstanding the great attention M. De Luc has bestowed on it,
still requires further examination, before it can be decided whether
it inclines to the Huttonian Theory, as on the first supposition, or
is, as on the latter hypothesis, equally balanced between it and the
_Wernerian_.
232. Whatever be the case with this fact, the general one of pieces of
rock being found insulated in veins, is certainly favourable to the
notion of an injected and ponderous fluid having originally sustained
them. Where, as happens in some instances, the stones contained in
the veins have no affinity to any of the rocks above, they cannot
be supposed to have come any how but from below, and to have been
carried up by the matter of the vein. The instance from the slip at the
Huddersfield Canal has been already mentioned.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account