Immortality proved by the testimony of sense : $b In which is contemplated the doctrine of spectres and the existence of a particular spectreCummings, Abraham
Religion
Immortality proved by the testimony of sense : $b In which is contemplated the doctrine of spectres and the existence of a particular spectre
Cummings, Abraham
Apparitions; Immortality; Spiritualism
[44] Here is a little mistake. It was not her mother,
but Mr. Blaisdel who proposed this question, by her
mother’s desire expressed to him.
[45] This sentence was uttered at another time. It is
believed by some, among whom is the writer, that
several interviews mentioned in the last letter were
not those of N. H., but of another Spectre. This may
be somewhat difficult, and doubtless not essentially
necessary to prove.
[46] That is, that they experienced the same.
[47] “Before she vanished.” That is, before she vanished
for the last time that morning, for this was after
she had vanished in the view of Mr. Downing, as in
Testimony 8.
[48] These last words declared to me by other witnesses
are not in the original testimony of Mrs. H. I have
therefore enclosed them.
[49] Her messages were probably such as never were since
Christ was on earth. Some of them are contrary to all
expectation, and exposed the families of Mr. Blaisdel,
Mr. Hooper, Capt. Butler, and Mrs. Butler, in
particular, to unjust reproach. Therefore the loving
kindness of the Lord to these families, made the
proofs as extraordinary as the messages, that whoever
shall calumniate either of those families, on account
of these events, may do it at their peril.
[50] Mr. D. has since declared that he had found all these
words to be true.
[51] They saw no personal form.
[52] The greatest things are from among the least.
[53] The order was nearly elliptical; for the two ranks
were joined by certain persons at each end.
[54] Whatever message enlarges or diminishes their doctrine
or worship, must undoubtedly be rejected and the
messenger too. But beware of extremes.
[55] There was no preacher in the town that day.
[56] _To have a familiar spirit_, as expressed in the Old
Testament, and, _To have a demon_, as expressed in the
New; seem to be phrases of the same import, and the
idea of it was that of criminality. But we find no
person in the New Testament justly accused of it.
Demoniacs were of another description. They were esteemed
innocent, and pitied, as being afflicted by the demons.
Possibly this in part was the true evil which afflicted
part of our land in 1692, and which our pious
ancestors unhappily mistook for witchcraft.
[57] The original of verse 11-12, is strictly thus: “And he
said, bring me up Samuel. And the woman saw Samuel and
cried out.” This strongly intimates that Samuel came
unexpectedly and without any previous divination. The
word _when_, in our translation has no responsive in
the original.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account