In Barbary : $b Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco and the SaharaPowell, E. Alexander (Edward Alexander)
History
In Barbary : $b Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco and the Sahara
Powell, E. Alexander (Edward Alexander)
Africa, North -- Description and travel
The impression of flatness is an optical illusion. Were a region that is
as rugged as, say, New England to be completely stripped of its cities,
villages, and farmsteads, its forests, lakes, and streams, its trees
and grass, I imagine that, despite the pronounced irregularity of its
surface, it would appear to one traveling across it to be a dead flat
plain. So it is with the Sahara. In reality it is not flat at all. It has
its mountains, its valleys, and its plains. Topographically speaking,
it is a region of the most varied surface and irregular relief, broken
by lofty table-lands and deep depressions, massive buttes and fantastic
crags, vast steppes covered with water-worn pebbles and loose stones,
cañons winding between precipitous walls, seas of shifting yellow sand
and oases green with forests of date-palms and other fruit-trees. Its
surface is still further diversified by numerous and extensive mountain
ranges, at least one of which, the Ahaggar, has an area greater than the
Alps and several peaks higher than any in the United States east of the
Rockies. Yet the children in our public schools are still taught that the
Sahara is nothing but a waste of sand, flat as a school-room floor!
From this it will be seen that the Sahara has the makings of much
picturesque and interesting scenery if it were properly upholstered. Its
deadly monotony is due to a lack of diversity in color rather than to a
lack of diversity in surface. The mountains, the plateaus, the crags,
and the cañons are all there, but there is nothing to bring them out,
to emphasize their presence. Since there is in that vast spaciousness
nothing with which to compare them, they appear insignificant, hardly
noticeable. Another thing. We of more favored lands are accustomed to
what might be described as vertical scenery—trees, crops, church-spires,
houses, fences—whereas the scenery of the desert is wholly horizontal.
This still further makes for monotony, so, instead of examining the
physical features of the country, the eye becomes wearied and is always
looking off toward the horizon.
I trust that I have now made it amply clear that the popular conception
of the Sahara as an expanse of sand—a conception which motion-pictures
and novels of desert life, as well as the illustrations in the popular
magazines, have done much to foster—is quite erroneous. There are broad
stretches of sand, it is true, the most extensive being the Igidi of
Mauretania, the Grand Erg Occidental to the south of Algeria, and the
Grand Erg Oriental to the south of Tunisia; but the actual area of pure
sand is relatively small, covering only about _one tenth_ of the Sahara’s
surface.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account