In Barbary : $b Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco and the SaharaPowell, E. Alexander (Edward Alexander)
History
In Barbary : $b Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco and the Sahara
Powell, E. Alexander (Edward Alexander)
Africa, North -- Description and travel
Not until its sprawling bulk has been fettered by some regular means
of communication can the Sahara be considered as effectually subdued.
There has been much talk from time to time of a trans-Saharan railway
from the rail-head at Colomb-Béchar in Southern Algeria to Timbuktu,
whence one branch would continue southward to link up with the Ivory
Coast system, while another would swing sharply westward to Dakar, on
the coast of Senegal, and a third branch might be pushed eastward to
the Lake Tchad country. The chief advocates of such a scheme are the
French imperialists and military authorities, who see in such a railway
a means of rushing vast numbers of black troops from the trans-Saharan
territories to the aid of the mother-country in the event of another
war. Personally, however, I do not look for this ambitious project to
be realized until some time in the distant future. True, there are
no insurmountable obstacles from the engineering point of view, as
preliminary surveys have shown, but there are numerous objections. First
of all, of course, comes the question of cost, which would necessarily be
enormous—an expense which France, in her present impoverished condition,
is quite unable to bear. Serious difficulties would be encountered in
finding sufficient labor and in providing adequate supplies of water and
fuel. It is generally admitted that it would be extremely difficult, if
not impossible, effectively to protect a desert railway of such length
from attacks by Touareg tribes. Such a system could not hope to be
self-supporting, for the length of haul would be enormous; most of the
country through which it would run is uninhabited and unproductive; and
there would be almost nothing in the way of freight or passengers to be
picked up along the route. Moreover it is becoming a grave question among
authorities on transportation whether, even under the most favorable
circumstances, railways can successfully compete with motor routes, the
initial cost of which is far less, and which can be operated far more
economically. The truth of the matter is that the recent conquest of the
desert by the motor-car has been a serious blow to the project for a
trans-Saharan railway, and I am inclined to believe that passengers and
goods will be borne across the Great Sands on rubber instead of rails for
many years to come. I doubt not that the desert motor service projected
by M. Citroen will shortly be revived, either by himself or others, and
that, in a much nearer future than most people suppose, it will be as
simple a matter to cross the Sahara to Timbuktu by automobile as it has
become to cross the Syrian Desert to Baghdad.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account