In Barbary : $b Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco and the SaharaPowell, E. Alexander (Edward Alexander)
History
In Barbary : $b Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco and the Sahara
Powell, E. Alexander (Edward Alexander)
Africa, North -- Description and travel
By the late winter of 1926 France and Spain, by a lavish expenditure of
their resources, had enveloped the Riff in a wall of steel, employing
every device of scientific warfare against the embattled tribesmen. Even
the Riffi recognized that further resistance was futile; the tribal
chieftains, either bought up by French and Spanish gold or to save
their skins, began to fall away from Abd-el-Krim, and before spring had
turned to summer that gallant fighter came riding astride a mule into
the French lines. The authority of his Shereefian Majesty the Prince
of True Believers had been upheld; the tyranny of Spain in the Riff
had been perpetuated; and France had won what the newspapers of Paris
proclaimed _une victoire glorieuse_. But I imagine that those who viewed
it, as I did, at close range and through glasses unclouded by rancor or
propaganda, thought it a rather sorry triumph.
Could France acquire the Riff from Spain—as there is no question that
she would like to do—and extend over that region the just and beneficent
rule which she has given to her own protectorate in Morocco, there is
no doubt that it would be the best thing for every one concerned, the
Riffi themselves included. And there is good reason to believe that
at one period of the conflict, when the gloom of discouragement and
threatened bankruptcy hung like a cloud over Spain, some such solution
was under serious consideration by the Madrid government. But it was here
that England stepped in. To France’s present position in Morocco Great
Britain has no objection; indeed, she made it possible through the pacts
she signed in London and at Algeciras. But to a French Morocco which
came down to the shores of the Mediterranean, particularly to a French
Morocco which included the great fortress at Ceuta, the statesmen of
Downing Street have the most unalterable objections. Ceuta, as you will
see by glancing at the map, is vis-à-vis to Gibraltar. And Gibraltar,
because of recent developments in warfare—particularly the airplane, the
submarine, poison gas, and long-range guns—is no longer so impregnable as
the British War Office and the Prudential Insurance Company would like
the world to suppose. Situated on a peninsula, with Spain at its back,
it is cut off from reinforcements save by sea, and it lacks, moreover,
a suitable terrain for the effective use of airplanes. Ceuta, which is
naturally even stronger than the Rock, and which could be made absolutely
impregnable by military engineers, is on the mainland, with all of Africa
from which to draw supplies and reinforcements, and it possesses the
other military facilities which its great British rival lacks. In the
hands of Spain, a second-rate power with few colonial ambitions and no
navy worthy of the name, Ceuta is not the slightest menace to Britain.
But let it pass into the possession of France, let it be fortified and
armed by French engineers, let strategic railways be brought up to its
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account