Sexism; Women -- Social and moral questions; Women -- Social conditions
This inclination toward beauty, of course, is dismissed by the average
male blockhead as no more than a feeble sentimentality. The truth is
that it is precisely the opposite. It is surely not sentimentality to
be moved by the stately and mysterious ceremony of the mass, or even,
say, by those timid imitations of it which one observes in certain
Protestant churches. Such proceedings, whatever their defects from the
standpoint of a pure aesthetic, are at all events vastly more beautiful
than any of the private acts of the folk who take part in them. They
lift themselves above the barren utilitarianism of everyday life, and
no less above the maudlin sentimentalities that men seek pleasure in.
They offer a means of escape, convenient and inviting, from that sordid
routine of thought and occupation which women revolt against so
pertinaciously.
41. The Ethics of Women
I have said that the religion preached by Jesus (now wholly extinct in
the world) was highly favourable to women. This was not saying, of
course, that women have repaid the compliment by adopting it. They are,
in fact, indifferent Christians in the primitive sense, just as they
are bad Christians in the antagonistic modern sense, and particularly
on the side of ethics. If they actually accept the renunciations
commanded by the Sermon on the Mount, it is only in an effort to flout
their substance under cover of their appearance. No woman is really
humble; she is merely politic. No woman, with a free choice before her,
chooses self-immolation; the most she genuinely desires in that
direction is a spectacular martyrdom. No woman delights in poverty. No
woman yields when she can prevail. No woman is honestly meek.
In their practical ethics, indeed, women pay little heed to the
precepts of the Founder of Christianity, and the fact has passed into
proverb. Their gentleness, like the so-called honour of men, is visible
only in situations which offer them no menace. The moment a woman finds
herself confronted by an antagonist genuinely dangerous, either to her
own security or to the well-being of those under her protection—say a
child or a husband—she displays a bellicosity which stops at nothing,
however outrageous. In the courts of law one occasionally encounters a
male extremist who tells the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the
truth, even when it is against his cause, but no such woman has ever
been on view since the days of Justinian. It is, indeed, an axiom of
the bar that women invariably lie upon the stand, and the whole effort
of a barrister who has one for a client is devoted to keeping her
within bounds, that the obtuse suspicions of the male jury may not be
unduly aroused. Women litigants almost always win their cases, not, as
is commonly assumed, because the jurymen fall in love with them, but
simply and solely because they are clear-headed, resourceful,
implacable and without qualms.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account