Japan -- Foreign relations -- Korea; Korea; Korea -- Foreign relations -- Japan
Finally, other more imperative duties called Count Inouye home, and
he was succeeded by Viscount Miura, a man of a different stamp. Then
followed the murder of the Queen, with all its unhappy train of
consequences. Although the crime was undoubtedly concocted by the Queen’s
implacable enemy, the Tai Won Kun, the Japanese Government never sought
to evade the share of responsibility imposed upon it. The tragedy was
a far severer blow to Japanese interests than to those of Korea, for
the Queen alive, and even still bitterly hostile to Japan, could never
have worked the harm that the manner of her taking-off had caused. And,
indeed, while apology for this murder from the moral point of view cannot
be justified, in spite of the cruel character of the victim and of the
fact that there was then visited upon her only the same treatment which
she had herself given to scores and hundreds of others, when considered
from the diplomatic point of view the act was even more foolish and
reprehensible.
The following account from Hershey[21] gives in brief, but with
sufficient detail for our purposes, the events of this period:—
The impolitic attempts at hasty and radical reform in Korea,
which followed the outbreak of the Chino-Japanese war, were
resisted by the Court party at Seoul, headed by the Queen and
the Min family to which she belonged. Early in October, 1895,
the Queen planned a _coup d’état_ with a view to disbanding
the soldiers who had been trained by Japanese officers, and of
replacing the pro-Japanese partisans of reform in the Korean
Cabinet by her friends. The result was a counter-plot (in which
the King’s father, the veteran conspirator Tai Won Kun, was
a prime mover) to seize the King and Queen with the aim of
obtaining complete control of the Korean Government in interest
of the pro-Japanese and reform party. In carrying out this
plot (in which the Japanese Minister Miura seems to have been
an accomplice) the Queen was murdered by Japanese and Korean
ruffians.
“This disgusting crime,” Hershey goes on to say, “although it assured
the power of the reform Cabinet for the time being, reacted upon its
perpetrators, and was followed, four months later, by another equally
revolting, by means of which Russia gained control of the Government of
Korea. In January, 1896, there took place a slight uprising in Northern
Korea, at the instigation, it was said, of pro-Russian leaders. When the
major portion of the army had been sent out of the capital to suppress
the rebellion, 127 Russian marines with a cannon suddenly landed at
Chemulpo on February 10, and immediately entered Seoul. The next day the
King, accompanied by the Crown Prince and some court ladies, fled in
disguise to the Russian Legation, where he remained until February 20,
1897.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account