Mountain life -- Tennessee -- Fiction; United States -- Social life and customs -- 19th century -- Fiction
The foreman interpreted this formula as a general inquiry into the nature
of the trouble. He began precipitately, the quaking men behind him
feeling all the despair of being the members of a responsible corporate
body of which he was the mouthpiece.
“Ye see, jedge, we-uns can’t but feel thar’s thirteen men on this jury.”
They felt the judge’s quick gray eye counting them. Perhaps at that
moment they were all indifferent to the terrors of their spectral
associate, so much more substantial a source of terror being presented to
them.
The man who had read the Code went on: “Pete Rood—him ez died las’
night—war neither excused nor discharged, so thar’s thirteen men on this
jury; an’ we hearn him talkin’ up-stairs along o’ the rest o’ the jurors,
sometimes interruptin’ us, an’ we-uns can’t agree ’count o’ thar bein’ a
harnt on the jury.”
Even he faltered before the look in the face of the judge, whose
decisions were thus frankly criticised. There was something terrible in
the fury that his eyes expressed. He sat motionless, with an air of great
calmness and dignity. His face, however, crimsoned to the roots of his
hair. The veins in his forehead stood out swollen and blue. There was an
intense silence for a moment. Then his voice, as always, singularly low
and inexpressive, broke the pause.
“Mr. Sheriff,” he said, “conduct those thirteen—those twelve men to the
county jail, and keep them there for contempt of court until ten o’clock
to-morrow morning, permitting no communication with others.”
He directed that a fine of ten dollars should be entered against each,
and forthwith adjourned the court.
This high-handed proceeding had no parallel in the annals of the circuit.
Harshaw, swelling with rage, found knots of men eagerly discussing it, as
he pushed his way out into the hall. Some one was advancing the opinion
that a jury in jail was no longer a jury, but merely twelve culprits.
Another found a hearty laugh in the reflection that they would not
probably discover so many harnts in jail as in the jury-room. A third
demanded of Harshaw, “Why didn’t he discharge the jury, and imprison them
as men?”
“Too afraid of the S’preme Court,” Harshaw hissed between his teeth.
“Wish he had! On appeal a premature discharge would operate as an
acquittal of the prisoner.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account