Mountain life -- Tennessee -- Fiction; United States -- Social life and customs -- 19th century -- Fiction
“It is impossible to seriously maintain that a fight between a couple of
country boys is a duel,” he vehemently insisted. “Everybody knows that
the common acceptation of the idea of a duel is a combat between men—men
of station” (Harshaw leaned forward with an air of mock attention,
placing his hand ostentatiously behind his ear)—“on some question of
honor, fighting under the control and direction of their seconds, at a
specified number of paces, and with pistols”—
“Enactment provides that they shall be silver-mounted, hair-trigger?”
sneered Harshaw.
Once more there was a call to order. But Kinsard, badgered, turned at bay.
“I heard Judge Gwinnan tell you once that unless you kept out of his way
he would beat you with a stick, like a dog. How you do tempt the cur’s
deserts!”
Harshaw rose hastily to his feet. He stood for a moment, his head
lowered, his eyes flaming from under his knitted brows; he looked like
the champion mad bull of an arena, about to charge. Suddenly he turned,
and without a word resumed his seat. There was a storm of applause from
every quarter of the House. A dozen voices were crying that the offensive
words should be taken down; the clerk hastily obeyed; they were read
aloud, and the speaker called upon Kinsard to deny them or retract.
Kinsard could have said with all the fervor of truth that he was sorry
indeed, but it was in an inapplicable sense. He saw, with a sinking of
the heart, the havoc he was making in another’s fate,—the moral murder
that hung upon his hands. He looked about with despair at the faces
around him: they had been friendly, partisan, when he began to speak
against the motion; now they were reluctant, alienated, antagonistic.
It were better for Gwinnan had he had no friend but his own repute. The
impetuous young fellow felt that he had done the worst that was possible.
He would not now eat his words. He looked at Harshaw with an indignant
divination of his motives, when that gentleman, begging the indulgence
of the House, moved that the matter be dropped. He was not here to
maintain personal consequence. He was willing—nay, eager—to waive any
individual considerations which hindered the deliberations of the House
and the course of justice. If the member were so ungenerous as to decline
to apologize for words spoken in heat, confirming them in cool malice,
he himself was able to overlook them, the more as his character was, he
trusted, too favorably known to be injured by these reflections.
He sat down in the midst of a clamor from a number of eager occupants
of the floor,—one of whom the speaker presently recognized,—protesting
against the unparliamentary nature of the proposal. The objectionable
words were again read, and the speaker called upon Kinsard to apologize
or to deny them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account