Great Britain -- History -- Victoria, 1837-1901 -- Fiction
Such a woman was Victoria of England, ready to be pleased with the
smallest things, praising what was good, saying little of what was not
good, and enjoying every little pleasure with a childlike zest and
simplicity. And yet, this gentle little lady understood so perfectly
her rights and duties as monarch of Great Britain that when her
Secretary of Foreign Affairs persisted in being quite too independent
in his methods of transacting business, she did not hesitate to write
to him the following very definite sentences:
"The Queen thinks it right, in order to prevent any mistake for the
future, to explain what it is she expects from the Foreign
Secretary. She requires:
"1. That he will distinctly state what he proposes in a given case,
in order that the Queen may know as distinctly to what she has
given her royal sanction.
"2. Having once given her sanction to a measure, that it be not
arbitrarily altered or modified by the Minister. She expects to be
kept informed of what passes between him and the Foreign Ministers,
before important decisions are taken, based upon that intercourse;
to receive the foreign dispatches in good time, and to have the
drafts for her approval sent to her in sufficient time to make
herself acquainted with their contents before they must be sent
off."
It is worth noting that the royal lady who wrote this epistle had
sufficient self-control to delay for five months forwarding it to the
offending Secretary, hoping that his methods would be amended and that
so severe a rebuke would become unnecessary.
CHAPTER XI
THE QUEEN IN SORROW
It had certainly become clear to all her Ministers that Victoria was no
mere figurehead, for while she yielded if their judgment was against
her, yet she never failed to have an opinion and a reason for her
opinion. In 1861, the fact that both she and Prince Albert were able to
think for themselves and had come to a wise conclusion proved to be a
matter of the utmost importance to two countries, England and the
United States. Everyone in England was thinking about the war in
America. The English government had declared that England would be
neutral, that is, it would do nothing to assist either the United
States or the seceded States. The United States Government was
indignant at this declaration, because it spoke of the seceded, or
Confederate States, not as if they were rebelling against the
government, but as if they were an independent power. The Confederate
States, however, were much pleased, and thought it quite possible that
England might be persuaded to help them. Their chief argument
was--cotton. These States were the ones that raised cotton, and with
the United States warships blockading their ports, there would be
little chance for cotton to reach England. Would not England, then,
help the seceders, put an end to the war, and have all the cotton that
her mills wished to use?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account