In the Dead of Night: A Novel. Volume 3 (of 3)Speight, T. W. (Thomas Wilkinson)
General
In the Dead of Night: A Novel. Volume 3 (of 3)
Speight, T. W. (Thomas Wilkinson)
English fiction -- 19th century
“Bristow,” he said, laying his hand affectionately on Tom’s shoulder,
“as I said before, you are a gentleman—a gentleman in mind and feeling.
More than that a man cannot be, whether his family be old or new. You
propose to do a certain thing which I can only accede to on one
condition.”
“Name it, sir,” said Tom briefly.
“I cannot take Knockley Holt from you without giving you something like
an equivalent in return. Now, I only possess one thing that you would
care to receive at my hands—and that is the most precious thing I have
on earth. Exchange is no robbery. I will agree to take back Knockley
Holt from you, if you will take in exchange for it—my daughter Jane.”
“Oh! Mr. Culpepper.”
“That you love her, I know already, and I dare say the sly hussy is
equally as fond of you. If such be the case, take her. I know no man
who so thoroughly deserves her, or who has so much right to her as you
have.”
CHAPTER XI.
THE EIGHTH OF MAY.
The eighth of May had come round at last.
Of all days in the year this was the one that Kester St. George
intended least to spend at Park Newton, but, as circumstances fell out,
he could not well avoid doing so.
After the death and burial of Mother Mim—the expenses of the last-named
ceremony being defrayed out of Kester’s pocket—it had been his
intention to leave Park Newton at once and for ever. But it so fell out
that in the document purloined by him from the pocket of Skeggs when
that individual lay dead on the moor, there was given the name of a
certain person, still living, who could depose, of his own personal
knowledge, to the truth of the facts as put down in the dying woman’s
confession. This person was the only witness to the facts there stated
who was now alive. The name of the man in question was William Bendall,
and the point that Kester had now to clear up was: Who was this William
Bendall, and where was he to be found? There was no address given in
the Confession, nor any hint as to the man’s whereabouts; but Skeggs
had doubtless known where he was to be found, and had, in fact, told
Kester that he could put his hand on the man at a day’s notice.
With such a sword as this hanging over his head, Kester felt that it
was impossible for him to leave Park Newton. When the man should learn
that Mother Mim was dead, which he probably would do in the course of a
few days, and when the restraining power which had doubtless kept him
silent should be removed for ever, what was to prevent him from telling
all that he knew, or, at least, from giving such broad hints as to the
information in his possession as might lead to inquiry—to many
inquiries, perchance: to far more than Kester would care to
encounter—unless he should ever be so unfortunate as to be driven to
bay?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account