In Trust: The Story of a Lady and Her LoverOliphant, Mrs. (Margaret)
General
In Trust: The Story of a Lady and Her Lover
Oliphant, Mrs. (Margaret)
Fiction
This secret incident in the family history left a great deal of
agitation in the house. Mrs. Mountford had not been informed in any
detail what her husband’s mission to Hunston was. She knew that he had
gone to ‘tamper with his will,’ as she said, but what were the exact
changes he meant to make in that will she did not know. They were
certainly to the advantage of Rose and to the detriment of Anne: so much
she was aware of, but scarcely anything more. And she herself was
frightened and excited, afraid of all the odium to which she would
infallibly be exposed if the positions of the sisters were changed, and
more or less affected by a shrinking from palpable injustice; but yet
very much excited about Rose’s possible good fortune, and not feeling it
possible to banish hopes and imaginations on this point out of her mind.
If Rose was put in the first place it would not be just--not exactly
just, she said to herself, with involuntary softening of the expression.
Rose’s mother (though she would be blamed) knew that of herself she
never would have done anything to deprive Anne of her birthright. But
still, if papa thought Anne had behaved badly, and that Rose deserved
more at his hands, he was far better--no doubt _far better_, able to
judge than she was; and who could say a word against his decision? But
it was very irritating, very wearing, not to know. She tried a great
many ways of finding out, but she did not succeed. Mr. Mountford was on
his guard, and kept his own counsel. He told her of Heathcote’s
proposal, but he did not tell her what he himself meant to do. And how
it was that her husband was so indifferent to Heathcote’s proposal Mrs.
Mountford could not understand. She herself, though not a Mountford
born, felt her heart beat at the suggestion. ‘Of course you will jump at
it?’ she said.
‘I do not feel in the least disposed to jump at it. If there had been a
boy, it might have been different.’ Mrs. Mountford always felt that in
this there was an inferred censure upon herself--how unjust a censure it
is unnecessary to say: of course she would have had a boy if she
could--of that there could be no question.
‘A boy is not everything,’ she said. ‘It would be just the same thing if
Anne’s husband took the name.’
‘Don’t speak to me of Anne’s husband,’ he cried, almost with passion. ‘I
forbid you to say a word to me of Anne’s affairs.’
‘St. John! what can you mean? It would be barbarous of me, it would be
unchristian,’ cried the much-exercised mother, trying hard to do her
duty, ‘not to speak of Anne’s affairs. Probably the man you object to
will never be her husband; probably----’
‘That is enough, Letitia. I want to hear nothing more upon the subject.
Talk of anything else you like, but I will have nothing said about
Anne.’
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account