In Trust: The Story of a Lady and Her LoverOliphant, Mrs. (Margaret)
General
In Trust: The Story of a Lady and Her Lover
Oliphant, Mrs. (Margaret)
Fiction
Her husband had a still harder life as being a free agent, and having
the whole weight of the decision upon his shoulders. It was not to be
supposed that he could free himself entirely from all sense of guilt
towards the child whom in his heart he loved most. He had resolved to
punish her and he clung to his resolution with all the determination of
a narrow mind. He had said that she should never marry the man who was
nobody, that if she held by him he would give her fortune to Rose. And
she did hold by him, with an obstinacy equal to his own. Was it possible
that he should bear this and give her reason to laugh at his words as
mere sound and fury signifying nothing? No, whatever he might have to
suffer for it, no! Perhaps, however, the great secret of Mr. Mountford’s
obstinate adherence to a determination which he could not but know to be
unjust and cruel--and of many more of the cruelties and eccentricities
that people perpetrate by their wills--lay in the fact that, after all,
though he took so much trouble to make his will, he had not the
slightest intention of dying. If a man does not die, a monstrous will is
no more than an angry letter--a thing which wounds and vexes, perhaps,
and certainly is intended to wound and vex, and which suffices to blow
off a great deal of the steam of family quarrels; but which does no real
harm to anybody, in that there is plenty of time to change it, and to
make all right again some time or other. Another thing which assisted
him in getting over his own doubts and disquietudes was the strenuous,
almost violent, opposition of Mr. Loseby, who did not indeed refuse at
last to carry out his wishes, but did so with so many protests and
remonstrances that Mr. Mountford’s spirit was roused, and he forgot the
questionings of his own conscience in the determination to defend
himself against those of this other man who had, he declared to himself,
nothing whatever to do with it, and no right to interfere. Could not a
man do what he would with his own? The money was his own, the land his
own, and his children too were his own. Who else had anything to do with
the arrangements he chose to make for them? It was of his grace and
favour if he gave them his money at all. He was not bound to do so. It
was all his: he was not responsible to any mortal; it was a pretty
piece of impudence that Loseby should venture to take so much upon him.
This opposition of Loseby’s did him all the good in the world. It set
him right with himself. But still those packets of papers, always
accompanied by a letter, were annoying to him. ‘I send you the draft of
the new codicil, but you must allow me to observe----’ ‘I return draft
with the corrections you have made, but I must once more entreat you to
pause and reconsider----’ What did the old fellow mean? Did he think he
had any right to speak--a country attorney, a mere man of business? To
be sure he was an old friend--nobody said he was not an old friend; but
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account