Incwadi Yami; or, twenty years' personal experience in South AfricaMatthews, J. W. (Josiah Wright)
History
Incwadi Yami; or, twenty years' personal experience in South Africa
Matthews, J. W. (Josiah Wright)
Diamond mines and mining -- South Africa; South Africa -- Description and travel
which the servant was liable was imprisonment with or without hard labor
for any period not exceeding twelve months, or to receive any number of
lashes not exceeding fifty, or to such imprisonment and such whipping.
At the time this proclamation was issued native labor was in great
demand on the fields, and consequently the power given to the master by
law was seldom if ever exercised, as he knew the almost certain result
would be the loss of all his servants. A change was made by this
proclamation of Aug. 10th, 1872, so far as unauthorized buyers were
concerned, their punishment upon conviction being fixed at a fine not
exceeding £100 sterling, or to imprisonment with or without hard labor
for any period not exceeding six months. The crime of inducing servants
to steal was punished more severely. Lashes not exceeding fifty were
provided for in the proclamation, and the imprisonment increased to a
period not exceeding twelve months, or to such imprisonment and such
whipping. Many white men received lashes under this clause, and amongst
others a German, who on coming out of prison, retired to his native
country with over £30,000!
The increasing desire for drink among natives was considered by the
authorities in those days one of the greatest causes of the development
of their thievish propensities, and the canteen keeper who bought a
diamond of a native, or took diamonds in payment or pledge for liquor,
in addition to the punishment already stated, forfeited his license and
became incompetent to hold one in the future. A further discretionary
power was given to the court by which any such person might be
convicted, of forfeiting his right to any claims and expelling him from
the territory; but the last proviso was laughed at by men who had
contravened this law, as no punishment for returning to the province had
ever been inserted by the framers. If stringent laws had been properly
drafted and enforced in the early days of the Fields, the abominable
illicit traffic might have been nipped in the bud.
A great deal of animosity toward the natives existed about this period.
Part of this feeling was originated, I think, from many white men not
possessed of claims being jealous of their black brethren digging at Du
Toit’s Pan and Bulfontein, while the facility for dealing in stolen
diamonds, afforded by their possessing a digger’s license, was also a
factor in the ill-will felt and expressed.
A great mass meeting was held in the Market Square, Kimberley, on
Friday, July 19th, 1872, to bring pressure to bear upon the three
commissioners who administered the government, and get them to take away
all claim licenses from black or colored men.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account