Incwadi Yami; or, twenty years' personal experience in South AfricaMatthews, J. W. (Josiah Wright)
History
Incwadi Yami; or, twenty years' personal experience in South Africa
Matthews, J. W. (Josiah Wright)
Diamond mines and mining -- South Africa; South Africa -- Description and travel
Again in Natal and the Transvaal no law connected with diamonds existed
except one in the latter State, forbidding the purchase of diamonds or
gold without a special license, or from a native, under a penalty of
five years’ imprisonment, £1,000 fine and confiscation, an ordinance
practically null and void, for these might be purchased without question
from any white man on paying a duty of five per cent.; consequently the
main illicit trade was done outside the confines of Griqualand West,
where there was no danger of interference from the detectives when
diamonds once were safely transported across the border.
The Volksraad, in the Transvaal, I ought not to omit mentioning, also
passed a clause in their extradition laws against all offenders charged
with contravening our diamond act, which, however, they expunged on May
26th, 1886, out of pique, because the Cape colonial government would not
take off the tax on tobacco and produce; consequently Christiana, a town
situated close to the borders of Griqualand West, is again the seat of
much illicit trade.
Natal, however, like the Transvaal, wants some good “quid pro quo”
before it will assist the Cape in suppressing this infamous trade.
During the session of the legislative council 1885–86, when the
“Post-office law amendment bill” was under discussion, in which power
was asked to detain and open certain letters, great and unhappily
successful opposition was made by certain members, Mr. Binnes, a rising
legislator, terming the clause this “jesuitical clause,” and two other
members expressing surprise at the “mean, sneaking power” which the
government by a “sidewind” wished to gain. For a time at least,
therefore, Natal has converted herself into a “thieves’ highway.” Again
in the present session, 1886–87, a similar bill has been thrown out.
This conduct on the part of Natal politicians is attributed to some
ill-feeling with respect to custom dues, and was wholly unjustifiable,
so much so that the sister colony by thus protecting the leeches that
suck the life’s blood of our great industry, lays herself open to the
charge of wilfully becoming _particeps criminis_.
These causes led to the most palpable, systematic and barefaced
robberies, as may be readily imagined. So long as the Kafir thieves and
white fences could in half an hour drive from Kimberley to the Free
State, where no _onus probandi_ of legal possession lay with the holders
of diamonds, and whence a seaport could be reached without passing
through any part of Griqualand West, the trade continued to thrive. Now,
however, the injustice under which we were laboring is greatly
diminished, first by the Free State Volksraad passing a law during the
last session containing the much desired _onus probandi_ clause, and
second by our own parliament awakening to a sense of its duty and
passing an act applying restrictions over the whole colony.[44]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account