Incwadi Yami; or, twenty years' personal experience in South AfricaMatthews, J. W. (Josiah Wright)
History
Incwadi Yami; or, twenty years' personal experience in South Africa
Matthews, J. W. (Josiah Wright)
Diamond mines and mining -- South Africa; South Africa -- Description and travel
and his, the old chief being ultimately given to understand that he and
his people and country were to be taken over, as Mr. Southey said, with
the knowledge and consent of the high commissioner. This was another of
the promises made only to be broken; and to prove beyond question that
all the troubles predicted have come about, it is only necessary to
allude to recent historical events culminating in Sir Charles Warren’s
expedition to Bechuanaland. Mr. Southey had from the time of his taking
office persistently requested the high commissioner to get the land
question settled, and had sent warning after warning that delay in
giving out the titles was fraught with the greatest possible danger. But
the high commissioner was in the hands of the secretary of the colonies
in the first place, and in the second his excellency had not mastered
the situation. Then those who fomented discontent and disturbance had
circulated, among other infamous slanders, that the lieutenant governor
and the secretary to government were men bent on land-jobbing in their
own interest and in the interest of their friends and political
adherents.
In the session of 1875 the high commissioner, despite his previously
issued reassuring proclamation to the effect that no private rights
should be disturbed, sent up a land ordinance drafted in Capetown, and
requested the lieutenant governor to introduce it to the legislative
council and get it passed into law. This the lieutenant governor
respectfully but firmly refused to do. By the draft ordinance a land
court was to be created, and a judge appointed to decide upon the claims
of every one, no matter whether his claims were disputed or not. Even
Waterboer himself, from whom the government had derived all their
territorial rights, was to be forced into court and pay the expenses
himself, to prove that his private properties, farms, etc., belonged to
him. The judge was, moreover, to have power to reduce the size of farms,
and in no case to permit one to be given out of more than 6,000 acres in
extent. The lieutenant governor held that by allowing this ordinance to
pass into the statute book the government would be abrogating its
especial function, which was to protect those who could produce
unimpeachable titles, whether obtained by grant, purchase or other
legitimate means. The cost of going to law to obtain them they, he said,
ought not to be compelled to incur. The law courts ought not, he
maintained, to be called upon to deal with any land claims excepting
such as were in dispute. The executive government could deal with the
undisputed claims, exchange British for existing titles, etc., thus
saving expenditure and delay, while the high court was quite sufficient
to deal with disputed claims.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account