Incwadi Yami; or, twenty years' personal experience in South AfricaMatthews, J. W. (Josiah Wright)
History
Incwadi Yami; or, twenty years' personal experience in South Africa
Matthews, J. W. (Josiah Wright)
Diamond mines and mining -- South Africa; South Africa -- Description and travel
Gen. Sir J. J. Bissett, in an address to the electors of Alfred and
Alexandra counties in June, 1884, recognizing the importance of this
point, said: “With regard to coolies, I consider that they are
introduced for a specific purpose, they should at the expiration of
their term of indenture be required to return to India, subject to a
maximum extension of term (say) to fifteen years in all. I consider that
any benefit derived from them by a section of the community is very
greatly counterbalanced by the injury their presence causes the colony,
both directly and indirectly. I am also opposed to coolies holding land
in this colony.”
In my opinion Sir J. J. Bissett’s views display a lamentable ignorance
of the first principles of political economy, and are suitable to a
timid mercantile community only, afraid of the further cheapening of
articles of consumption. A great proportion of the Indians, both in the
West Indies and in Natal, as soon as they have served their time and are
free from their indentures, become in every sense thorough colonists;
they buy property, invest their savings, “marry and are given in
marriage,” and show no desire, as statistics prove, to return to
India—differing entirely from the Chinese, whose sole object is to
return home as soon as possible with every sixpence they can drain out
of the country in which they have been living. To my mind the turning
away of thrifty bread winners from a country sparsely populated by an
infinitesimal working class of whites is the height of absurdity. There
is not even the excuse on the ground of morality which the Americans
have against the Chinese in California. Moreover, how would Sir J. J.
Bissett treat the question of the increase in their population? Would
the children born in Natal be allowed to remain there or not? Would he
have the Indians under British rule treated in the same manner as the
Dutch have since treated them in the Transvaal State, where, certainly
without the “liberty, equality and fraternity” popularly supposed to
pertain to republican ideas, they passed a law through the Volksraad,
which was promulgated on June 10th, 1885, disqualifying “Coolies, Arabs,
Malays and other Asiatics” from obtaining the right of citizenship, or
from possessing landed property, and compelling them further, under
penalty, not only to register themselves, and pay £25 for so doing, but
also giving the government power to place them in locations;[66] or
would he have them treated as they are in the other Dutch republic (the
Free State), where it is contrary to law to let fixed property to Arabs,
and where they cannot even procure a license to trade.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account