Index Expurgatorius Anglicanus: Or, a descriptive catalogue of the principal books printed or published in England, which have been suppressed, or burnt by the common hangman, or censured, or for which the authors, printers, or publishers have been prosecutedHart, W. H. (William Henry)
History
Index Expurgatorius Anglicanus: Or, a descriptive catalogue of the principal books printed or published in England, which have been suppressed, or burnt by the common hangman, or censured, or for which the authors, printers, or publishers have been prosecuted
Hart, W. H. (William Henry)
Prohibited books -- England -- Bibliography
There does not appear to be a copy of this book preserved in the
British Museum Library: but it is printed in extenso in the fourth
volume of Cobbett's Parliamentary History. For writing the same,
a prosecution was instituted against Fitzharris. The indictment
charges first, that the defendant, described as late of the parish
of St. Martin in the Fields, Middlesex, gentleman, did, on the
twenty-second day of February, in the thirty-third year of the
reign of King Charles the Second, compass treason with one Edmund
Everard against the king; and further, that the defendant as a
false traitor did treasonably, maliciously and advisedly write
and publish a certain most wicked and traitorous libel intituled
_The true Englishman speaking plain English_, in which libel are
expressed and declared the treasons and treasonable compassing,
imaginations, and purposes of the defendant to excite and persuade
the subjects of the King to rise up and rebel against the King
and to deprive and depose the King from the style, honour, and
royal name of the Imperial Crown of this kingdom, as follows: _If
James_ (meaning James, Duke of York) _be conscious and guilty,
Charles_ (meaning the King) _is so too, believe me, both these are
brethren in iniquity, they are in confederacy with Pope and French
to introduce Popery and Arbitrary Government as their actions
demonstrate. The Parliament, Magna Charta, and liberty of the
subject, are as heavy yokes they'd willingly cast off, for to make
themselves as absolute as their Brother of France; and if this can
be proved to be their aim and main endeavour, why should not every
true Briton be a Quaker thus far? And let the English spirit be up
and move all as one man to self defence, nay send if need be to
open action and fling off those intolerable Riders._ (meaning the
King and the Duke of York.) And in another part of the aforesaid
most wicked and traitorous libel are contained among other things
these false, seditious, and traitorous sentences following:--_J.
and C._ (meaning James, Duke of York and the King) _both brethren
in iniquity, corrupt both in root and branch as you have seen, they
study but to enslave you to a Romish and French-like yoke. Is it
not plain? Have you not eyes, sense, or feeling? Where is that old
English noble spirit? Are you become French asses to suffer any
load to be laid upon you? And if you can get no remedy from this
next parliament, as certainly you will not, and that the K. repents
not, complies not with their advice, then up, all as one man. O
brave Englishmen, look to your_
(HERE ENDS THE ORIGINAL WORK)
FOOTNOTES:
[1] Life and Reign of Queen Elizabeth, p. 486.
[2] Strype's Annals, Vol. 2, p. 562.
[3] Judgment Roll, Queen's Bench, Mich., 26 & 27 Eliz., roll 37.
[4] Missionary Priests, p. 84.
[5] Dom. Elizabeth, 1599, June, July, Bundle 271, No. 11.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account