Indian Fights and Fighters: The Soldier and the SiouxBrady, Cyrus Townsend
History
Indian Fights and Fighters: The Soldier and the Sioux
Brady, Cyrus Townsend
Dakota Indians -- Wars; Indians of North America -- Wars -- 1866-1895
While technically it was perhaps a drawn battle, as a feat of arms the
battle of the Rosebud must go down to the credit of the Indians. It was
more like a pitched battle than any that had been fought west of the
Missouri heretofore. The individual officers and soldiers of the army
did splendidly; so did the Indians. Mills had displayed commendable dash
and daring in all his charges. Royall, Henry and Van Vliet, and Chambers
with the infantry, had fought skilfully and bravely against an
overwhelming force. Crook’s dispositions were good on the field, and
were well carried out by his subordinates. The same may be said of Crazy
Horse, his subchiefs, and their warriors.
Crook had nearly exhausted his ammunition in the hard fighting, the
larger part of his supplies had been expended, and he had a number of
very seriously wounded on his hands. There was not one chance in a
thousand that he could catch the Indians now. There was nothing left for
him to do but go back to the main camp, send his wounded back to Fort
Fetterman for treatment, order up more supplies and more troops, and
await a favorable opportunity to attack again.
To anticipate events, it may be noted that, owing to the disaster to
Terry’s column, Crook did not advance until August.
-----
Footnote 56:
Tatá ^nka I yotá ^nka, according to a letter from Mr. W. H. Holmes,
Chief of the Bureau of American Ethnology, Smithsonian Institution.
Footnote 57:
General King, in his fascinating book, “Campaigning with Crook,” has
preserved a characteristic anecdote of Royall, which I venture to
quote as illustrating the way they have in the army, and as throwing
some light on the temperament of the peppery old fighter:
“A story is going the rounds about Royall that does us all good, even
in that dismal weather. A day or two before, so it was told, Royall
ordered one of his battalion commanders to ‘put that battalion in camp
on the other side of the river, facing east.’ A prominent and
well-known characteristic of the subordinate officer referred to was a
tendency to split hairs, discuss orders, and, in fine, to make trouble
where there was a ghost of a chance of so doing unpunished. Presently
the colonel saw that his instructions were not being carried out, and,
not being in a mood for indirect action, he put spurs to his horse,
dashed through the stream, and reined up alongside the victim with:
“’Didn’t I order you, sir, to put your battalion in camp along the
river, facing east?’
“’Yes, sir; but this ain’t a river. It’s only a creek.’
“’Creek be d—d, sir! It’s a river—a river from this time forth, _by
order_, sir. Now do as I tell you!’
“There was no further delay.”
Footnote 58:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account