Indian Fights and Fighters: The Soldier and the SiouxBrady, Cyrus Townsend
History
Indian Fights and Fighters: The Soldier and the Sioux
Brady, Cyrus Townsend
Dakota Indians -- Wars; Indians of North America -- Wars -- 1866-1895
On the morning of the 27th of June Terry and Gibbon rescued Reno. The
next day the surviving troops of the regiment, with some individuals
from the other command, marched to the scene of Custer’s defeat to
identify and bury the dead. The bodies upon the dry grass had all been
stripped and left, white and ghastly save for the red stains of wounds.
The bodies of Doctor Lord, Lieutenants Porter, Harrington, and Sturgis,
with those of a number of men, were not recovered. What became of them
is not known to this day. They may have been captured alive and taken by
the Indians to the village, and there tortured to death and their bodies
disposed of. This, however, is unlikely. The Indians positively deny
that they took any prisoners, and it is probable that they did not.
There are quicksands near the bed of the Little Big Horn, and possibly
those bodies were engulfed in them. But all this is only surmise. No one
can tell anything about it, except that they were undeniably killed. And
we may be certain they died as brave men should.
They buried two hundred and twelve bodies on the hill, and the total
losses of the regiment in the two days of fighting were two hundred and
sixty-five killed and fifty-two wounded—over fifty per cent. The losses
of the Indians were never ascertained. They did not, however, begin to
equal those of the soldiers. It is grossly unfair to speak of the battle
as the “Custer Massacre,” as is often done. Custer attacked the Indians,
and they fought him until all the white men were killed. There was no
massacre about it.
The cause of the disaster must, first of all, be laid to Custer’s
disobedience of orders. In spite of that, however, I think it is
probable that he might have won the battle, or at least made good his
defense until relieved by Terry and Gibbon, although sustaining heavy
loss, had it not been for three happenings. The first was the vastly
greater number of Indians in the field than any one expected to
encounter. The next, and to me this is absolutely decisive, was Reno’s
failure to press his attack. If he had gone in with the dashing
gallantry which was expected of him, while it is certain that he could
not alone have whipped the Indians, yet he could have so disorganized
them as to have maintained his position in the valley in the midst of
the village without the greatest difficulty, until Custer could fall
upon the rear of those attacking him, and Benteen, with the pack train,
could reinforce them both. The Indians say that they were demoralized
for the time being by Reno’s sudden appearance, and that the squaws were
packing up getting ready for flight when the weakness of Reno’s advance
encouraged them to try to overwhelm him. Custer had a right to expect
that Reno would do his duty as a soldier and take a bold course—which
was, as usual, the only safe course.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account