Indian slavery in colonial times within the present limits of the United StatesLauber, Almon Wheeler
History
Indian slavery in colonial times within the present limits of the United States
Lauber, Almon Wheeler
Indians of North America; Indians, Treatment of -- United States; Slavery -- United States; Thesis (Ph. D.)
THE INSTITUTION AS PRACTICED BY THE
ENGLISH
CHAPTER IV
+The Number of Indian Slaves+
To arrive at any knowledge of the exact number of Indian slaves in
any of the English colonies is impossible. Census reports and other
vital statistics are infrequent or lacking, especially in the early
colonial period; and often in such statistics as are extant Indian
slaves either receive no mention, or are classed with negro slaves
without distinction. From existing records, however, one is able to
obtain a knowledge of the comparative numbers in the different groups
of colonies, and to some extent in the individual colonies, during
the colonial period. New England and the southern colonies were the
sections that employed Indian slave labor most extensively, the south
taking precedence, for climatic conditions there were more favorable,
and economic conditions made necessary a larger quantity of servile
labor than was required in the north.[345] Yet New England made use of
the natives as slaves as long as they lasted,[346] and drew further
supplies from Maine,[347] the Carolinas,[348] and other districts.[349]
Among the English colonies, the Carolinas stood first in the use of
Indians as slaves. Such use began with the founding of the colony.
The need for laborers was great; the source of supply was near at
hand and the colonists availed themselves of their opportunity.
Probably captives of the Stono War became the Indian slaves mentioned
in the inventory of Captain Valentine Byrd, “one of the grandees of
the time.”[350] In a report on conditions in the colony, made to the
proprietors, September 17, 1708, by Governor Nathaniel Johnson and his
council, the number of Indian men slaves was given as 500, Indian women
slaves, as 600, Indian children slaves, as 300, a total of 1400 Indian
slaves. The number of negroes at the same time was stated as 4100, of
indentured servants, 120, and of free whites, 3960. The governor gave
the cause of the rapid increase in the number of the Indian slaves
during the five preceding years, as “our late conquest over the French
and Spanish, and the success of our forces against the Appalaskys and
in other Indian engagements.”[351]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account